sciscape Publications
← All publications

North American breeding-bird community temperature index fell in 1970–1996 and rose in 1997–2024 in all 30 tested BBS regions, at 25% of full tracking, but not more where June warming was larger

Question: the community temperature index (CTI) of North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) communities has a near-zero 1966–2024 trend. Is this because two opposite periods cancel, does the change of direction occur in each region, and which species cause it? Data: BBS 2025 release (127,646 standard runs, 5,306 routes, 10,229 observers, 534 species, 1966–2024); June temperature from GHCN_CAMS, checked with GISTEMP, CRU TS 4.09, Berkeley Earth and May–July values; habitat classes from the PIF ACAD. Method: count-weighted species temperature index from route June climate; log-weighted CTI; annual indices with route × observer and year fixed effects and a first-year-observer term; period trends, a one-break fit, and a 2° spatial-block bootstrap. Full tracking is the spatial CTI–temperature slope (0.52) times the warming trend. An exact additive decomposition gives species and habitat contributions. Results: the CTI decreased by 0.034 °C per decade in 1970–1996 (95% CI −0.044 to −0.024) and increased by 0.062 in 1997–2024 (0.054 to 0.069). The break year was 2000.5 (1998.3 to 2002.0). June warming increased from 0.17 to 0.48 °C per decade at the same time. The 1997–2024 tracking ratio was 0.25 (0.21 to 0.29; 0.20 to 0.32 in 17 variants), and the 1970–2024 ratio was 0.04 (−0.005 to 0.10). The 1997–2024 increase occurred in all 5 regions, both countries, and all 30 Bird Conservation Regions with at least 40 routes (lower limit above zero in 25). The CTI trend did not increase with warming across 98 cells of 4° (Spearman 0.02; slope −0.03 vs 0.52 expected) or across regions. Forest species gave 77% of the 1997–2024 increase; Eurasian Collared-Dove gave 13%. The 1997–2024 increase was stable when species were resampled (0.014 to 0.116; STI-shuffle p = 0.056), but the 1970–1996 decrease was not (−0.092 to 0.019). The increase also occurred within observers in their first 8 years. Limitations: roadside counts without detection models; observer drift is only partly controlled; a large same-observer CTI step from 2019 to 2021 (+0.049 °C) is not explained by temperature, but the trend to 2019 was still 0.054; STI is truncated at the BBS area; the break model is descriptive and does not identify a cause.

community temperature index · climatic debt · North American Breeding Bird Survey · thermophilization · climate change · bird communities · observer effects · breakpoint · species decomposition · Bird Conservation Regions

Admitted 6 citing publications

References

16
  1. usesdoi:10.5066/P14SNUV4

    BBS 2025 release (1966–2024) is the bird count data.

  2. usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470

    GHCN_CAMS monthly temperature for STI, spatial slope and warming.

  3. usesdoi:10.1029/2018JD029522

    GISTEMP v4 for a warming-rate check.

  4. usesdoi:10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3

    CRU TS 4.09 for a warming-rate check.

  5. usesdoi:10.5194/essd-12-3469-2020

    Berkeley Earth gridded temperature for a warming-rate check.

  6. supportsNorth American breeding-bird community temperature index did not follow 1966–2024 May–June warming at BBS routes on continental, route or yearly scales; residents followed more than migrants sci:sha256:01e8a212bcac3d0ef878e2f8314746c8782e23f453855a8b0888cbd17d44e22b

    Same BBS release; our 1970–2024 tracking ratio (0.04) and the decrease-then-increase pattern agree with its results; we add a break fit, period ratios, regional replication and species decomposition.

  7. supportsObserver terms change the bird community temperature trend tenfold on 1,859 North American BBS routes (1970–2024), and within-observer declines are larger for high-pitched species sci:sha256:7895a5193624b2e131a63cb83531022a3859b2aa20011aea787f85ff0cc8a8f0

    Observer terms change the BBS CTI trend; our route-only versus route × observer results and tenure checks agree.

  8. On the same BBS routes, landbird populations in the warmer part of their species' thermal range declined relative to colder-range populations in 1994–2023, but not in 1970–1993 sci:sha256:0b3a500a77e7b948e13239d57f1b8375c2f28b6f677fe48b45c57f4b1647cd53

    Within-species warm-range declines in BBS appear after about 1994, similar in time to the CTI break.

  9. Czech breeding bird community temperature index rose at 29% of full tracking in 1982–2024, but not more than with shuffled species values and not more where sites warmed more sci:sha256:b75c32633ae979145bba77671dca661bf69e33c2ec4d73a41109ef935f88e187

    Czech and UK CTI analyses with similar tracking ratios and no link to local warming.

  10. Swedish bird community temperature index rose 0.06 °C per decade on 714 routes in 1996–2025, about half the long-term warming rate, but did not follow route warming rates or annual temperature sci:sha256:c84dfd7d5e48bd849b12a21d84ef26c02ce0b64d3d4de299884f282a9a9a2f66

    Swedish CTI analysis with a similar result.

  11. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0878

    CTI and climatic debt method.

  12. doi:10.1038/nclimate1347

    Continental climatic debts of birds and butterflies.

  13. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13433

    Breeding versus wintering CTI trends in North America and Europe.

  14. doi:10.2307/4088860

    First-time observer effects in the BBS.

  15. doi:10.1002/ece3.1101

    Observer ageing in long-term avian surveys.

  16. doi:10.1126/science.aaw1313

    Decline of the North American avifauna.

Cited by

6 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.