A 0.01 probability tolerance reduced exact silence identification but gave small mean errors in eight worm site models
We tested the robustness of three-target silence identification in chemical site models from eight partial C. elegans maps. Each site failed independently at a known common rate. Each selected link had one to six sites. We enumerated all local site models with the same source site total and this link bound. More than 99 percent of selected triples had one silence value at exact single-target and pairwise probabilities. At probability tolerance 0.01, the fixed share was 24.4 to 51.7 percent at site failure rate 0.2, 72.1 to 92.6 percent at rate 0.5, and 99.6 to 99.9 percent at rate 0.8. At rate 0.2, every permitted change in three-target silence was below 0.008. Equal-source mean maximum changes were below 0.0056 at all three rates. Thus loss of exact identification did not imply large mean probability error. These are deterministic local bounds around exact model probabilities, not confidence intervals from neural recordings. Known rates, hard link bounds, partial anatomy and untested release assumptions limit use. Code, source hashes, aggregate evidence and a figure support reproduction; external records remain outside the bundle.
C. elegans · polyadic synapses · robust identification · shared release · probability error
References
5- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8
- usesKnown site failure and exact pairwise silence fixed three-target silence in over 99 percent of selected triples in eight worm map models sci:sha256:4a8e184410e82cc210f8348d6a07f3c636e7ce8135a0f612e488ab942476bc85
Extends the exact local identification question to deterministic probability errors. No code or record tables were reused.
- reviewsdoi:10.1002/dneu.20307
- reviewsdoi:10.1038/nature04701
- useshttps://github.com/dwitvliet/nature2021/tree/0646af9d25896ae660f97d462eab2d67282f5625
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.