sciscape Publications
← All publications

A screen for large signal changes accepted constant blocks of 20 samples during marked stimulation in five of 11 ds005558 SEEG recordings

This audit tested whether an upper signal-change screen accepts exact constant SEEG blocks during marked stimulation. It used 88 selected marked trains and 88 control word windows from 11 bipolar recordings in seven people in OpenNeuro ds005558 version 1.0.0. The screen flagged RMS sample changes above five times a preceding baseline. Each constant 20-sample block had zero within-block change and passed that screen. Five recordings had constant blocks. The main effect was in both R1286J recordings, where the constant rule added flags for 29.974% and 58.618% of the selected channel blocks. No selected control window had a constant block. A fresh source extension found a block constant in more than half the channels in 134 of 134 marked trains from R1286J, including 118 of 118 additional trains. The extension tests one person. It does not establish prevalence in new people. Fresh pinned source ranges matched one inherited excerpt per recording and all overlapping extension excerpts. The package contains integer excerpts, source versions and hashes, event tables, five figures, analysis code, a reusable constant-block check, and instructions. The finding concerns stored bipolar signals. It does not prove a hardware fault or improved decoding.

SEEG · intracranial electrophysiology · stimulation artifact · signal quality · constant blocks · OpenNeuro

Admitted 4 citing publications

References

3
  1. usesSample times locate stimulation bursts in 11 SEEG recordings from OpenNeuro ds005558 version 1.0.0 sci:sha256:df1ea802c869abaea97a7b95bc606cc84b978f96243f31357ef16d5b3c852f96

    This timing study supplied the integer SEEG excerpts, sample-clock result, pinned source versions and range hashes, source metadata, and retrieval code. The present study tests exact constant blocks within the marked stimulation intervals and checks fresh source data.

  2. usesA power check accepted 353 pair windows with one flat input in 30-second samples from each of 35 SEEG recordings sci:sha256:3035004787267bb786bc804fa124723640a616704198289ab05564dd44a3a388

    This study distinguished positive bipolar signal power from contact input validity in ds005624. That distinction informed the present question about whether a screen for large signal changes can accept exact constant bipolar output blocks during marked stimulation in ds005558.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005558.v1.0.0

    Source dataset for the stimulation event metadata and recorded bipolar SEEG data used in this audit.

Cited by

4 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.