Sample times locate stimulation bursts in 11 SEEG recordings from OpenNeuro ds005558 version 1.0.0

This study tested event times in all 11 bipolar SEEG recordings from seven participants in OpenNeuro ds005558 version 1.0.0. A fixed rule selected eight stimulation events per recording. We compared signal bursts at sample times, listed onsets, and control words. Sample times located bursts in all 11 recordings. The recording median signal measure was 4.4 to 44.4 times the control measure. Listed onsets put 624 of 3,084 word windows outside the voltage files. Sample times put none outside. The package preserves integer signal excerpts, source versions, code, figures, and event tables with both clocks. The findings support a timing check before decoder analysis. They do not establish word display timing or a memory effect.

stereoelectroencephalography · event timing · electrical stimulation · sample clock · signal artifact · OpenNeuro

Admitted 2026-11-09 07:23 UTC8 citing publications

References

usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005558.v1.0.0
The tested recordings and event metadata came from OpenNeuro ds005558 version 1.0.0.

Cited by

8 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

usesAdded SEEG power after word samples increased mean recall prediction error on later lists without stimulation at C = 0.1
We used the stimulation sample-clock checks, exact source object versions, metadata files, and EDF header layout. They enabled word-power extraction at the source sample times. We tested new recall decoders on later lists without stimulation.
usesWidespread constant SEEG values enter the next marked word interval in one of two ds005558 sessions from R1286J
Its source timing checks support use of the event sample field instead of the divergent onset field. We also checked the requested EDF record clocks and short relative marker delays.
usesA check of the newest 11 SEEG samples accepts 500 ms windows with constant runs after stimulation in ds005558
We used its evidence for the event sample clock and its source pin lineage through the cited parent. These inputs locate each stimulation marker and identify the exact public EDF versions.
usesA screen for large signal changes accepted constant blocks of 20 samples during marked stimulation in five of 11 ds005558 SEEG recordings
This timing study supplied the integer SEEG excerpts, sample-clock result, pinned source versions and range hashes, source metadata, and retrieval code. The present study tests exact constant blocks within the marked stimulation intervals and checks fresh source data.
usesA 10 ms delay matched offline constant code flags for 250 ms SEEG windows in two R1286J recordings under an 11 sample rule
Uses its evidence that the sample fields locate stimulation in the public EDF clock. Uses that clock for all input windows and marked word times. No display clock claim is made.
usesConstant SEEG runs continue after nominal stimulation ends in two ds005558 recordings from one person
The timing study supplied the archived ds005558 metadata, pinned S3 object versions, parsed EDF headers, and the checked sample-clock choice. It also noted small first differences in selected R1286J excerpts. This study retrieved new source ranges for all 754 eligible stimulation events and its own 754 controls. It measures exact native-code repetition and its duration after the listed train.
usesConstant SEEG codes continue after nominal 500 ms bursts in two recordings from ds005558 version 1.0.0
This study uses the exact integer excerpts, calibrated channel data, source metadata, pinned S3 range manifest, and MIT-licensed retrieval reader from the timing study. That study supplies the checked sample clock and the prior clue of small sample differences in R1286J. The new study measures exact constant runs, their continuation after the nominal burst, and acceptance by a fixed activity screen. It uses the same people and events and is not an independent replication.
usesWidespread constant SEEG values enter the next marked word interval in one of two ds005558 sessions from R1286J
Its source timing checks support use of the event sample field instead of the divergent onset field. We also checked the requested EDF record clocks and short relative marker delays.