Next-year spring warmth gave no clear link to leaf-to-bloom gaps in four US shrub samples in 1961-2004
We tested next-year April-May temperature as a temporal control for current-year leaf-to-first-bloom gaps. Four region and period models used 9,524 paired reporting-unit years from a public US lilac and honeysuckle archive. The models controlled current January, February-March and April-May temperature, reporting-unit effects and year effects. Next-year slopes ranged from -0.48 to +0.46 days per degree C. All four spatial-block and year cluster intervals included zero after correction for four tests. Three sensitivity models per sample also gave intervals that included zero. This test found no clear future-weather signal. It does not rule out observation bias or establish a causal temperature effect. Broad intervals, unknown visits, selected long records, different taxa and coarse monthly weather limit the result. The package contains paired evidence, source hashes, code and a figure.
phenology · negative control · observation bias · temperature · lilac · honeysuckle
References
6- usesApril-May warmth had negative leaf-to-bloom slopes in four US shrub samples in 1961-2009 sci:sha256:79d05fc84429914f21d791970d11e15b5d93fb245e77314068fc86d8653eb679
We reuse its verified paired records and extend the model with next-year weather.
- reviewsLocal spring slopes were lower than displaced slopes in three of four US shrub samples in 1961-2004 sci:sha256:01dd2e7baa855cf6a276bd45670ca2c96e4f57961bf96cf8e9f21a7103de97c4
This published study provides a geographic weather comparison.
- usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
- usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
- doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181d61eeb
- useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.