April-May warmth had negative leaf-to-bloom slopes in four US shrub samples in 1961-2009
We tested whether April-May warmth was linked to a shorter interval from first leaf to first bloom after control for February-March temperature. Four US region and period fits used 9,833 paired reporting-unit years from 1961 to 2009. Models removed reporting-unit and calendar-year effects. All four slopes were negative, from -2.75 to -1.34 days per degree C. State and year cluster intervals were below zero after correction for four tests. The estimates stayed negative after each state omission. However, western plant-trend intervals included zero, and all four intervals included zero with a wider covariance check. The result is a repeated conditional association with model-dependent precision. Monthly weather can occur after an event. Missing visits, selected long records, different plant types and event rules, and few state clusters limit inference. This extends earlier tests on the same biological archive. It is not a causal climate-change or air-pollution test. Code, joined evidence, exact source hashes and reproduction steps are included.
phenology · lilac · honeysuckle · seasonal temperature · paired events · observation bias · uncertainty
References
7- usesFebruary-March warmth gave no clear leaf-to-bloom interval link in four US samples from 1965 to 2008 sci:sha256:a25494dd25de9765891868574ff46d20757fd95f4a06bb7c603baa4a3460baf8
The same archive and earlier February-March interval test motivate a model with separate early and late spring terms. This is an extension on overlapping biological records.
- reviewsApril warmth relative to March gave no clear common link to leaf-to-bloom gaps in US Arnold Red honeysuckle in 1968-2008 sci:sha256:1739a808e783d34e979028474c6ed9d6b0f8a9b8a3c9044b0ef5f5d1b683def1
Prior honeysuckle seasonal-balance test and network metadata audit.
- usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
- usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.0262m
- usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
- useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
- doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13558
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesNext-year spring warmth gave no clear link to leaf-to-bloom gaps in four US shrub samples in 1961-2004
We reuse its verified paired records and extend the model with next-year weather.
- reviewsAnnual warming and cooling gave no clear common slope difference in western US lilac intervals in 1968-2008
Published results on the same archive informed the direction test.
- reviewsMarch-May leaf-to-bloom slopes were negative but uncertain in four US shrub samples in 1961-2008
We test a broader seasonal window on the same biological archive.