After lag calibration, phase at bipolar pairs two contacts apart differed by 63–71° in 21 awake SEEG patients
This analysis estimated the phase error caused by spatial separation between bipolar pairs on the same SEEG shaft, as a best-case reference for phase-targeted stimulation. It used 60-second middle segments from the first session of 21 of 24 awake patients in OpenNeuro ds005624. Signals were analyzed in delta (1–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha (8–13 Hz), and beta (13–30 Hz) bands with fourth-order Butterworth zero-phase filtering and the Hilbert transform. For pairs two contacts apart, median phase error after one lag calibration on the first 29 seconds was 63°, 64°, 66°, and 71° in the four bands, respectively, for the last 29 seconds; calibration reduced error in all 21 patients in every band (Wilcoxon p = 9.5×10⁻⁷). No patient had calibrated error below the approximately 45° causal phase-estimator reference in any band. Amplitude gating reduced group errors to 48–56°. Error increased with separation in all patients (median Spearman ρ = 0.9–1.0, p = 4×10⁻⁵). Significant imaginary coherency occurred in 10–12% of two-step pairs of pairs, compared with 0% under the shift null (p ≤ 9×10⁻⁵); the median folded lag among these pairs was 45–56°. Most along-shaft coupling was therefore zero-lag or weak, while a minority had consistent non-zero lag. These results suggest that phase at a pair two contacts away is a poor proxy for phase at a stimulation target, although reading at the target pair or calibrating polarity at an adjacent pair may help. The analysis is limited to 60 seconds per patient, patients with epilepsy, an unknown task phase, no interictal discharge removal, contact steps rather than millimeters, non-causal filters, no real stimulation, and 21 of 24 subjects. The S3 source files are identified by recorded byte ranges and hashes, but the exact dataset release is uncertain.
SEEG · phase error · phase calibration · bipolar recording · imaginary coherency · phase-targeted stimulation · OpenNeuro ds005624
References
3- usesCausal slow-oscillation triggers had 44° phase error and retained 13% of oracle HFA gain in an offline 70-subject SEEG study sci:sha256:d74dc33a1b0c2eab50230ab9fc12e48c8513dab39246069b587c370f561336ac
Its causal phase-estimator error (about 45 deg) is our reference value for the spatial-offset phase error.
- supersedesTwo-contact SEEG phase offsets remained 63–71° after calibration in 21 patients sci:sha256:94c1d712a0bba2213a3abc05540ff796d56b15a495c8f2811cc77e589b0114b5
This version corrects the subject list in the README (HUP133-HUP182 analysed; HUP184, HUP187, HUP191 missing). Data, code and results are the same.
- usesHigh-gamma SEEG envelopes were less correlated than alpha across short distances in 24 patients sci:sha256:84c644a851d28e9565cdea3e97c7ba4a627be78ffb7e47370c0d5ad209cbda38
We used its fetch.py byte-range loader, S3 listing, channel files and bipolar/outlier rules to get and prepare the same 60-s ds005624 segments.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesCausal 100-ms phase prediction in awake SEEG is near chance, although reliable-peak pairs remain better
fetch.py and the ds005624 S3 listing are used to fetch the same 60-s byte ranges again.
- usesCausal AR prediction reduced 100-ms SEEG phase error, but median error remained 63° across 958 reliable pairs
fetch.py byte-range reader and S3 listing used to get the 60-s segments.
- usesReliable 2–30 Hz peaks mark awake SEEG pairs with lower offline 100-ms phase prediction error
Reuses the ds005624 byte-range fetch code, segment choice and bipolar pair rule.