sciscape Publications
← All publications

In 51 FR1 SEEG patients, sex differences in the encoding memory effect and recall were not detected, but the confidence interval did not exclude a difference as large as the group effect

We asked whether female and male patients with stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) differed in the word-encoding subsequent memory effect (SME) or delayed free-recall rate. We analyzed archived per-word log10 band-power features from 54 patients in the FR1, session 0 sample of OpenNeuro ds004789 v3.1.0; 51 patients (27 female, 24 male) met the requirement of at least 15 recalled and 15 not-recalled words. For each pair and band, we removed list and serial-position means and z-scored over words. We calculated Cohen’s d for recalled versus not-recalled words and averaged across pairs to obtain each patient’s SME. The female-minus-male difference in the primary tilt measure (z-scored 70–150 Hz minus z-scored 3–8 Hz power) was −0.006 d (95% CI −0.041 to +0.030; Holm-adjusted p = 1.0). Differences were also not detected for high-frequency activity (HFA; +0.008 d, p = 0.57) or theta (+0.017 d, p = 0.44). Recall rates were 0.276 in females and 0.270 in males (difference +0.006, 95% CI −0.050 to +0.063; p = 0.83). The pooled tilt SME was +0.022; its confidence interval spans −1.9 to +1.4 times that group effect, so these data do not exclude a sex difference as large as the group effect. The null result is not an equivalence result. Findings were similar after age adjustment and in a hippocampal-pair analysis. Limitations include 51 patients, one session, recorded biological sex only, differing electrode coverage, low split-half reliability of subject-level SME, and no medication, seizure-onset, or hormone data. The sample includes epilepsy patients only.

subsequent memory effect · word encoding · free recall · stereoelectroencephalography · sex differences · high-frequency activity · theta · hippocampus

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesIn 51 pure-SEEG FR1 patients, sample-timed HFA decreased and theta increased with serial position sci:sha256:1da9d2dc0707f4d6cf26a2edf8d7e8f74cdb417581b20b70aafdf258db4aedc8

    We used its archived sample/fs-timed per-word band-power features of 54 FR1 patients (SHA-256 values agree with its manifest).

  2. supportsRecall rate did not correlate with encoding HFA or theta effects in FR1 and catFR1 patients, and FR1 effects had low reliability sci:sha256:f873f1e0b551d083148bd0854407e3cdb6709ecfdcbc66a0111287f228ace85f

    Like this work, we find that between-subject tests of the subject-level SME have low sensitivity; the sex contrast CI is wider than the group SME.

  3. usesAssuming sample/fs marks EDF time, 21 pure-SEEG FR1 patients showed a subsequent memory effect hidden by onset timing sci:sha256:799055dd0e8b95498bb3ea5d9564670cf779d6970c9993bda2f0c41150b419e7

    22 of the feature files come from f3620001 through d3aeb47e; f3620001 showed that sample/fs epoch timing is necessary.

  4. usesPatient-level SEEG memory effects did not reliably track recall rate in one free-recall session sci:sha256:17b11d65c60a0d9b507768c546d9b9df1dcc24530db8058de22452ad91357947

    We used its subject SME definition (list and position means removed, mean Cohen's d over pairs); our pooled HFA and theta SME agree with its values.

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004789.v3.1.0

    The sex and age table and recorded sample provenance refer to OpenNeuro ds004789 v3.1.0; archived per-word features were identified as FR1, session 0 data from this release.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.