sciscape Publications
← All publications

SEEG from five patients showed a mean 41 percent late absolute peak disagreement above 20 ms for separate smoothed five pulse means with Pearson r≥0.8

We tested whether waveform shape agreement gives late peak time agreement. The source was public SEEG from five patients in OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2. Each comparison used separate groups of five pulses. We tested all 126 divisions at 1,081 fixed stimulation site and receiving contact links. An 11-bin box mean preceded absolute peak selection between 50 and 250 ms. Pearson correlation used the same samples. Among comparisons with correlation at least 0.8, the mean patient fraction with a peak gap above 20 ms was 41.0 percent. The descriptive 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was 35.1 to 47.8 percent. The fraction was 25.3 percent when both peak signs agreed, and 33.7 percent at correlation at least 0.9. A proof shows that high correlation alone cannot bound the peak gap below the full time grid span. The result concerns this sample and estimator. It does not establish a biological or clinical error rate. All planned checks are reported. Fresh source decoding reproduced all 3,477,760 saved waveform values. Alternate calculations gave the same primary threshold decisions. A full repeat matched all 17 numerical output files. The package contains code, pulse windows, original metadata, source hashes, retrieval recipes, comparison scores, results, figures, a proof, checks, and instructions. The local plan had no external registration.

stereoelectroencephalography · evoked potentials · peak timing · waveform correlation · reproducibility

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

4
  1. usesThe mean patient median peak gap between reused and separate five pulse estimates was 0.661 baseline RMS units in five SEEG patients sci:sha256:200ca28b748d433e2b2c55ce512abca1bc91d5395210890b782904b94f0e5bb5

    We used its pulse windows, source metadata, extraction code, source locks, and provenance. Fresh decoding checked these inputs. That work reported peak time gaps without a correlation requirement. This study tests timing agreement conditional on waveform correlation.

  2. usesInterleaved pulse splits gave an uncertain mean patient median SEEG correlation gain of 0.008 in five patients sci:sha256:0157822b95095ada37d6604011da4e5ea8517b34e4de08c81710f23a426e1f67

    We used its report as method context for shape agreement between separate pulse means. Its contact sample and time window differ from this study. Its numerical results were not used as observations.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004457.v1.0.2

    Source SEEG recordings and metadata used for this analysis; the exact version is pinned in the source locks.

  4. usesdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1325-22.2023

    Study describing the source electrical stimulation recordings; cited for source context and attribution.

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.