sciscape Publications
← All publications

Peak amplitude scores had a higher mean AUC than peak isolation scores for late peak time agreement in five SEEG patients

We tested whether a peak isolation score from five pulses ranked late peak time agreement with five unused pulses better than a peak amplitude score. The source was public OpenNeuro ds004457, version 1.0.2. The sample had 1,081 stimulation site and receiver pairs in five patients with SEEG implants. SEEG means stereoelectroencephalography. We searched absolute peaks from 50 to 250 ms after a pulse. We subtracted a before-pulse mean and used an 11-bin box mean at 512 Hz. Agreement meant a peak time gap of at most 20 ms. Both scores used the same early pulse variation scale. Mean patient AUC was 0.630 for isolation and 0.689 for amplitude. AUC means area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The paired difference was -0.059, with empirical limits from -0.091 to -0.023. These limits describe five-patient resamples; they are not a calibrated population interval. Mean agreement in the highest quarter was 0.498 for isolation and 0.595 for amplitude. All nine fixed after-pulse settings had a negative mean AUC difference for isolation minus amplitude. A check added after analysis removed one pair with a constant pulse and gave the same direction. The margin proof needs a bound on waveform change. The tested pulse variation scale does not provide that bound. Neither score gives a timing guarantee or detects a neural response. The package preserves the local fixed plan, the marked addition, data, full results, source locks, code, and repeat instructions. A fresh raw rebuild matched every saved array. A second analysis gave identical bytes for all 17 numerical result files.

stereoelectroencephalography · peak timing · signal processing · AUC · electrical stimulation

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

6
  1. usesStrong SEEG responses had 48 percent mean agreement within 10 ms for 20–300 ms peaks from unused pulse groups in five patients sci:sha256:092a51ee3f6e31e7e25efe91f7903b2e4d48401f0bb5278e7941385636c1c021

    This report was read after the main analysis. Its constant-pulse finding led to the marked source quality check. It also supplies related timing context and the same elementary peak margin condition. It did not supply the main analysis input or change the fixed plan.

  2. usesSelected SEEG pairs had mean patient agreement of 75% within 10 ms for 20–100 ms peaks in five patients sci:sha256:9a99cb66bdcb057ec0eac344fa921f6f285c0201e748c5a61e5cd2bf51c9b37f

    This report was read after the main analysis. It supplies related context on the effect of search windows and the same constant source pulse. Its endpoint differs from the score AUC tested here. It did not supply the main analysis input or change the fixed plan.

  3. usesSEEG from five patients showed a mean 41 percent late absolute peak disagreement above 20 ms for separate smoothed five pulse means with Pearson r≥0.8 sci:sha256:321fe5dffd9bda55915cb0360180786244325bbab49a62af9a78c77bc116ac76

    This study uses the five pulse window arrays, public metadata, contact selection, source hashes, and raw extraction recipe from this publication. It tests a new comparison of early peak isolation and amplitude scores for later peak time agreement.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004457.v1.0.2

    This is the exact version of the OpenNeuro dataset used to select and process the five-patient SEEG sample.

  5. usesdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1325-22.2023

    This study describes the stimulation dataset and provides its scientific source context.

  6. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105

    This related work motivates careful measurement of evoked response waveform shape and trial variation; it was not a comparator in this report.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.