sciscape Publications
← All publications

RMS ratios kept decisions under simulated gains shared by both windows, with no clear accuracy gain in eight SEEG patients

We tested a reader of four stimulation sites in eight patients. We used public SEEG from OpenNeuro ds005448 version 1.0.0. Each site had five fit pulses and five later test pulses. Four recording pairs were selected from fit responses. Division of response root mean square (RMS) by RMS before the pulse gave 61.25% accuracy. Response RMS alone gave 64.375%. The equal-patient difference was -3.125 percentage points. Its descriptive 95% patient bootstrap interval was -10.625 to +5.000 points. The ratio reader kept all 16,160 site decisions under simulated gains shared by both windows. A proof states the gain conditions. Timing alone identified 158 of 160 sites. This limits claims about neural origin and performance after all fitting. The package preserves 52,640 new RMS values, fitted readers, pulse decisions, three figures, source checks, and repeat instructions. Independent checks passed. A second run matched all numerical outputs. The data were reused, and the study is exploratory.

stereoelectroencephalography · brain-computer interface · root mean square · signal normalization · site classification · recording gain

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesMinimum separation selection gave 68.1% later accuracy versus 71.9% for total separation with four SEEG pairs in eight patients sci:sha256:bc716215574010f916b876329fffa4113b0aaf4f05d9607a781bd5f520535874

    We reused its fixed four-site SEEG sample, metadata, cosine inputs, audit voltage, source pins, and retrieval code. These inputs enabled a new complete-waveform RMS comparison. We also matched all 160 archived signed-reader decisions.

  2. usesGlobal amplitude removal lowered mean site accuracy after recorded contact order reversal in eight STReEF patients with four SEEG pairs sci:sha256:84285597246fb5fb9c594f376f9def4dfde8ac5b145d2ad68c66a8f5b3927cf3

    Its response-amplitude removal and gain tests motivated the question about division by RMS before a pulse. We used a different feature and made a new reader comparison. Its record gives context for prior cohort reuse.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0

    The analysis used the eight SEEG patients in OpenNeuro ds005448 version 1.0.0 (STReEF); the exact-version source record reports CC0.

  4. doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100274
  5. doi:10.1007/s12021-022-09567-6

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.