sciscape Publications
← All publications

For fixed sounds, greater speech and song pattern spread repeated in two fMRI groups; a test in six SEEG patients failed

We tested whether speech and song have more repeatable pattern spread than other human voices. Separate public studies supplied human SEEG high-gamma responses and fMRI BOLD responses. Each person supplied three repeats or response estimates, nine other-voice clips and 28 speech or song clips. One repeat set site scales from 128 nonvocal sounds. The other two set distances after spatial means were removed. Development used two patients and four adults. A local code lock preceded tests in six other patients and 16 other adults. Mean spread differences were -0.00481 and +0.16879. Their 95% person Student limits were [-0.26155,0.25192] and [0.12722,0.21036]. The shared test failed, p=0.53125. Eight adults from a separate fMRI study gave +0.07317 [0.02512,0.12121]. That study adds people but uses the same sounds. Its person-and-clip range included zero. A 24-site rule reversed its mean. Negative people and all planned checks remain. An exact one-scalar model gives high direction agreement with either more or less spread. Named audio features had lower total speech/song variance but allowed a linear projection with higher variance. Thus neither direction agreement nor total acoustic variance identifies the neural explanation. The contribution is a checked group-variation assay, a failed shared test, and compact derived pair data. Clinical coverage, source selection, few clips, different cohorts and sensing filters limit scope. No positive neural generalization across modalities or causal effect was confirmed.

human SEEG · fMRI · auditory cortex · natural sounds · crossvalidated distance · repeatable pattern spread · negative result · sound sampling

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

10
  1. usesAfter calibration to unrelated sounds, speech patterns had greater pair agreement than other voices and animal sounds in human iEEG and two fMRI cohorts sci:sha256:91527309e9faffa6262bc6da6a1dc64d6a38c285dc4b2c5df3ad3967434a3159

    Its speech direction result and stated noise and mean limits motivate the new centered-repeat test. We use different electrical measurements and a speech/song class.

  2. usesFixed speech/song readers kept minimum AUC above 0.5 after one positive and six negative score replacements in six SEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults sci:sha256:9574090898ae6932a7b1e5e8090d19fc2689f88e8b747b55ae488dde00a32162

    Supplies credited MIT download code, source pins and source-format knowledge.

  3. Two fixed voice detail tests failed their shared rule in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:6a6ca6a9f2b860488aff637c6a6a22a497d79cc900757f0f36a02979b42f7f9d

    Related work tests relative voice variation in preference-selected site panels and reports failed shared tests. The present endpoint compares full-class speech/song and other-voice spread.

  4. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
  5. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
  6. doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
  7. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
  8. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
  9. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.012
  10. doi:10.7554/eLife.82566

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.