After calibration to unrelated sounds, speech patterns had greater pair agreement than other voices and animal sounds in human iEEG and two fMRI cohorts
We tested whether speech gives more consistent spatial response directions across clips than other human voices and animal sounds. Separate public human studies supplied signed iEEG and BOLD fMRI responses. The locked electrical code pooled three early windows. A later audit found that the prose plan specified only 100–400 ms. That window is a separate post-result check. Unrelated sounds set each site's mean and scale. We then divided each target response vector by its length. Mean cosine over distinct clip pairs measured concentration. This assay is invariant to fixed nonzero affine site changes, including polarity. Four people per modality supplied development. Fixed tests used 20 other patients and 16 other fMRI adults. Mean speech-minus-human and speech-minus-animal scores were 0.32137 and 0.50523 in iEEG, and 0.56906 and 0.55322 in fMRI. All four person mean intervals were positive. Both shared tests passed person mean, sign, and common-label requirements after correction for two claims. The label reference accounted for three planned response definitions. A later fixed follow-up used eight adults from a separate fMRI study. Both scores were positive in all eight. Requiring evidence in all three cohorts gave Holm p=0.0078125 for each claim. The fMRI cohorts used the same clips. Rank and spatial mean controls retained positive reserved means. Acoustic features also had this order. An electrical acoustic residual model failed under extrapolation. Speech had higher fMRI repeat agreement. Models with noise or class mean changes gave positive concentration differences without less latent variation. The result supports measured directional alignment for two fixed panels. It does not establish an abstract speech code, neural compression, a common cause, or causality. The package gives source pins and terms, permitted inputs, plans, all outcomes, figures, independent audits, code, and repeat steps.
auditory cortex · speech · intracranial EEG · fMRI · response geometry · directional concentration · data reuse
References
9- usesFor two fixed sound panels, rank readers ordered speech above animal sounds and animal sounds above controls on average in iEEG and fMRI sci:sha256:09a49aff63d8381c88639621a36a1d2be6aec37c6c45e2cddc92b79c0efc5aee
We reuse its licensed patient-labelled electrical derivative, source labels, source extraction code and fixed source pins. Its decoder ordering result motivates a different within-class geometry test.
- For two fixed non-vocal sound panels, pair relations agreed across 15 iEEG patients and 12 fMRI adults after one training pattern was removed sci:sha256:500f341c2503f97fb7e148d77c129827d6629d5f629f1c98e78185fbc0dbd66a
Related tests of sound-pair geometry and limits on neural-source claims informed the interpretation.
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.20599001
Version 1.1 supplies the public CC BY 4.0 electrical responses, source metadata and acoustic descriptors.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.07.063
Original electrical study and preprocessing context.
- usesdoi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
B2021 human fMRI acquisition cohort.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
NH2015 independent human fMRI acquisition cohort.
- usesdoi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
Public fixed author archive supplies both fMRI response arrays and metadata. The paper states that the acquisition cohorts contain 28 unique people.
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.043
Prior work on voice category geometry.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.069
Fixed source naming and fMRI acoustic feature matrices; original MAT arrays remain external.
Cited by
8 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAt an 80% target, limits set with other sounds gave lower mean coverage for voices in 20 iEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
The compact public electrical derivative and source-reader lineage pass through this work.
- usesFor 165 fixed sounds, four-component models reduced repeat error in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
Its measured concentration result and stated noise limits motivate the repeat-prediction question. We do not reuse its electrical cohort.
- usesFor fixed sounds, greater speech and song pattern spread repeated in two fMRI groups; a test in six SEEG patients failed
Its speech direction result and stated noise and mean limits motivate the new centered-repeat test. We use different electrical measurements and a speech/song class.
- usesDirection limits for voices failed a shared test in 20 iEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults; the response origin changed coverage at fixed RMS error
This source lineage supplies electrical inclusion and alignment records. It also gives prior direction comparisons.
- usesRepeat variance profiles agreed on average between people in SEEG and one fMRI study; a second fMRI transfer test failed
The auditory parcel rule and source documentation trace to this study through SCI 03515be7.
- usesSpeech and song axes gave positive mean repeat scores for nine voice clips in SEEG and two fMRI cohorts
Verified BOLD source pin, ten-parcel rule, and related within-class auditory geometry result. Its electrical data and outcome scores are not reused.
- Two fixed voice volume tests did not confirm shared effects in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
Its direction concentration analysis motivates a separate test of affine response rank.
- usesAcoustic models fit to other sound classes predicted music response patterns in 20 iEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
Verified licensed electrical derivative, extraction code, source pins and notices. Earlier response concentration outcomes are not reused as data.