Repeat variance profiles agreed on average between people in SEEG and one fMRI study; a second fMRI transfer test failed
We tested whether natural sounds have repeat variance profiles that agree between people after control for source classes and measured mean response strength. Separate public studies supplied human SEEG high-gamma activity and BOLD fMRI. A local plan fixed the endpoint before development. Fixed references used two SEEG patients and four fMRI adults. Tests in six other patients and 16 other fMRI adults gave mean adjusted correlations of 0.1513 and 0.0983. Their pointwise 95% person t intervals were [0.0969,0.2057] and [0.0585,0.1382]. The fixed shared mean, sign, and label-reference rule passed, p=0.015625. The same MRI reference failed transfer to eight adults from a second study: mean -0.0192, interval [-0.0860,0.0476]. We retain all negative results. A source audit found the same three sound orders in all eight SEEG records. A deterministic trend with presentation rank gave agreement of one with no sound effect or random error. Simple schedule controls did not remove the measured agreement. Thus the example limits interpretation but does not identify the human cause. The score concerns relative disagreement of processed estimates. Electrical task repeats and MRI scan estimates have different precision and filters. Source selection, fixed sounds, small reference groups, clinical sampling, and unequal cohorts limit scope. No intrinsic neural noise mechanism or causal result is established. The package gives code, derived summary inputs, all results, source pins and terms, figures, local plans, failure logs, and repeat instructions.
SEEG · fMRI · auditory cortex · repeat variance · measurement uncertainty · stimulus order · replication · human neuroscience
References
11- usesSpeech and song axes gave positive mean repeat scores for nine voice clips in SEEG and two fMRI cohorts sci:sha256:6720e49a50bda02902607508181e2616c7f5e48b21bceee56a2d3fcdc618bdae
We reuse its MIT source retrieval and preparation code, exact public data pins, and source documentation. We test a new endpoint.
- usesAfter calibration to unrelated sounds, speech patterns had greater pair agreement than other voices and animal sounds in human iEEG and two fMRI cohorts sci:sha256:91527309e9faffa6262bc6da6a1dc64d6a38c285dc4b2c5df3ad3967434a3159
The auditory parcel rule and source documentation trace to this study through SCI 03515be7.
- Exploratory tests found site pair map agreement across fixed sound panels in pre-onset iEEG from 17 patients and fMRI estimate differences from 16 adults sci:sha256:c7bb574d983f669a8b8279bd16f1a820ea70c064bc2fee7c92cadc665a617249
Related tests examined site pair agreement in averaged electrical responses and fMRI estimate differences.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0156-16.2016
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006397
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
- doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.8349727
Cited by
6 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- For 128 fixed sounds, scales from repeat differences gave higher mean matching AUC than variance scales in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
Its repeat-variance study and common schedule counterexample informed the limits and the added position control.
- usesAfter site scaling, a spatial filter gave lower mean gains for voice sounds than for source nonvoice sounds in six SEEG patients and two fMRI cohorts
Motivates the common event-order audit and control. No outcome data reused.
- usesFixed tests did not confirm a shared positive memory relation or EEG–fMRI transfer of repeatability for 102 videos
Motivates repeat-profile transfer and explicit stimulus-order audits. Our endpoint, item join, and data differ.
- Mean sound class scores from repeat spread were above chance in six SEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults; a fixed shared test failed
Related repeat-spread work and shared-schedule confound.
- usesFixed donor weights raised mean error estimates at 24 selected sites in six SEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults
This study tested cross-person repeat variance profiles. We extend that question with a fixed allocation loss.
- A fixed test did not confirm that class tags improve forecasts of repeat disagreement in six SEEG patients and two fMRI studies
Prior repeat variance profile tests and shared SEEG event-order warning.