Two fixed voice volume tests did not confirm shared effects in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
We tested repeatable spatial response diversity in separate public human SEEG and fMRI studies. A volume method fits no response axes. A local plan fixed two endpoints before reserved scores: third volume in 37 voice-related sounds and area in nine nonspeech human voices. Tests used six SEEG patients, 16 B2021 adults, and eight NH2015 adults. All 30 people had positive third-volume scores. Means were 0.020204, 0.014127, and 0.009778. The SEEG 95% person interval was [-0.000200,0.040608]. The shared Holm p was 0.051555, so the fixed test failed. The nonspeech test also failed, p=0.8465. It had positive fMRI evidence and a negative, uncertain SEEG mean. Every negative score remains. Exact models show that independent repeats can give positive mean and majority volumes when all sound means are constant. Thus repeat independence alone does not identify mean-response rank. Under a common mean and errors independent across sounds and repeats, the volume gives a conditional rank test. Nonlinear readout, source selection, clinical sampling and vascular filters limit neural interpretation. Independent simplex determinants reproduced all 60 person endpoints within 1.56e-15. The package gives code, proofs, exact source pins and terms, all results, figures, local plans, and repeat steps. Original neural arrays remain external. No positive shared neural or causal claim is made.
SEEG · fMRI · human auditory cortex · voice responses · affine rank · repeat noise · negative result · simplex volumes
References
10- usesSpeech and song axes gave positive mean repeat scores for nine voice clips in SEEG and two fMRI cohorts sci:sha256:6720e49a50bda02902607508181e2616c7f5e48b21bceee56a2d3fcdc618bdae
We reuse its exact source pins, source terms and MIT preparation code. Its projection result does not determine response rank.
- After calibration to unrelated sounds, speech patterns had greater pair agreement than other voices and animal sounds in human iEEG and two fMRI cohorts sci:sha256:91527309e9faffa6262bc6da6a1dc64d6a38c285dc4b2c5df3ad3967434a3159
Its direction concentration analysis motivates a separate test of affine response rank.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
- doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
- doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1346-5
- doi:10.1073/pnas.2506535122
- doi:10.1073/pnas.2533074122
Cited by
6 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA fixed three-group area test failed across six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults despite mostly positive scores
Motivates the volume assay and its error-model audit. The new endpoint tests three broad group means.
- A detector trained on nonvocal sounds ranked fixed vocal groups above controls in selected records from six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
Related tests of vocal response geometry in these cohorts; its negative results motivated explicit measurement-model checks.
- usesA Gaussian correction removed bias in one model; voice tests did not confirm a shared third response direction in SEEG and fMRI
Prior third-order volume method and independent-repeat correlated-noise limits. Our new methodological contribution is the Gaussian correction and exact equivalent implementation.
- usesA fixed test did not confirm a response level and repeat spread relation in human SEEG and two fMRI groups
We use its exact source pins, category rule and repeated-response extraction procedure. The covariance endpoint is new.
- usesTwo fixed sound volume tests failed a shared SEEG and fMRI rule; repeat screening biased a rank-one control
It supplies the prior volume target and independent-repeat noise limit.
- usesArea scores from three repeats had positive means for two sound panels in six SEEG patients and two fMRI cohorts
Builds on its exact correlated-noise limit for repeat Gram areas. The signed response minor removes that within-repeat covariance requirement under independent full repeats.