A detector trained on nonvocal sounds ranked fixed vocal groups above controls in selected records from six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
We tested whether human vocal sounds have unusual spatial response patterns relative to nonvocal sounds, without fitting a detector to vocal examples. Separate public studies supplied SEEG high-gamma responses and BOLD fMRI estimates. Development used two patients and four adults. A local code lock preceded tests in six other patients, 16 other B2021 adults and eight NH2015 adults. Training used 96 nonvocal sounds. Targets were nine nonspeech voices or 28 speech/song sounds, each compared with 32 held-out nonvocal sounds. The final transform removes spatial mean and vector length after site scaling. It is invariant to positive test-vector gain, conditional on the source zero and fixed training scales. Both unadjusted and repeat-alignment-adjusted scores were required. Adjusted mean AUCs were 0.633, 0.654 and 0.677 for nonspeech voices, and 0.769, 0.895 and 0.874 for speech/song. Both shared tests passed Holm correction, p=0.03125. All required person intervals and fixed-fit person-and-sound ranges were above 0.5. One adjusted MRI person score was below chance. An exact gain model exposed a centering-order error that was fixed before confirmation. Equal true direction distributions with unequal measurement noise also gave high novelty, so this ranking does not identify a new neural direction or a common cause. Source selection used the full panel. Separate cohorts, fixed sounds, clinical sampling, source filters and measurement differences limit scope. Code, source pins and terms, all results, figures and repeat steps are supplied.
human auditory cortex · SEEG · fMRI · voice · nonvocal reference · cross-modal test · repeat alignment · measurement noise
References
10- usesCalibrated extra axes reduced mean repeat error in 16-site panels from six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:7c0a90903c8778e544631e53774eab4fec574bbee872860a83c747f9b5037e6d
We reuse the pinned public source preparation code, with its upstream credits. The novelty endpoint and audits are new.
- Two fixed voice volume tests did not confirm shared effects in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:9b3d595e0b8e51f670afe0ac3c4b1cb85fdb9298e50d70e3ab00725ef36ae11b
Related tests of vocal response geometry in these cohorts; its negative results motivated explicit measurement-model checks.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.8349727
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
- doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.07.063
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.012
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Vocal ranks from repeat changes exceeded chance in six SEEG patients and two fMRI studies, but the fixed baseline rule failed
Related vocal response novelty test, distinct from repeat-change classification.