sciscape Publications
← All publications

A 200 ms baseline gave 53 to 61 percent control calls in two SEEG recordings at a nominal 5 percent limit

We tested whether an early baseline can set a response cutoff across six SEEG contacts. The data were 630 pulses at 63 surface stimulation sites in two public recordings from OpenNeuro ds004774 release 1.0.0. A detector drew 4999 averages from a 200 ms baseline and used a nominal 5 percent cutoff for the maximum across contacts and time. It called 20 of 33 and 16 of 30 sites in a separate window before the pulse. A check that kept pulse alignment also failed the control. Response AUC ranged from 0.772 to 0.896 against three expert label sets, but the fixed cutoff called 68 to 83 percent of expert negatives. The output is a reproducible calibration failure case and audit tool for BCI response detectors. The result applies to this detector and these two recordings. Sites share contacts, so bootstrap intervals are descriptive. The package preserves code, compact native voltage, source ranges and hashes, null and bootstrap draws, tables, three figures, and reproduction instructions. All 630 source ranges were freshly checked and rebuilt to exact input equality. An independent calculation and a full numerical replay passed.

SEEG · brain-computer interface · evoked response · baseline calibration · signal detection · OpenNeuro ds004774

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesA 20 percent trimmed mean raised expert label AUC from 0.892 to 0.923 for ten pulses and a 10 to 90 ms score with each method's baseline SD in UMCU25 SEEG data sci:sha256:36cb57450cbf648a949cb28196cb42a663ecd2059a06b7a8a4685ded6c178319

    We used its compact native arrays, expert label table, source manifest, selection, and retrieval code. We verified inherited file hashes and rebuilt the arrays from fresh source ranges.

  2. usesTen-pulse means had higher response label AUCs than first pulses for a fixed 10–90 ms absolute score in two SEEG recordings sci:sha256:1dfa7a52fe9acf5f4a7a85e2004bf3a19d22575d694466d89d391e4150e0d226

    Its compact array recipe and label audit are the original source of the inputs and retrieval code inherited through publication 5967273a-78e7-469f-a706-2bbc7dfcdca9.

  3. usesPulse sign tests across six contacts gave 9% call rates before stimulation in two SEEG recordings sci:sha256:a5c2810414a877f27a01d90bf6b7432c2bb98cb5b20da654ecd16a6bb9a199fb

    We used its description as prior work on null tests across six SEEG contacts. Our test uses baseline segments and different windows and score correction. We do not infer a method advantage from rates across these different targets.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004774.v1.0.0

    The analysis used data from this exact OpenNeuro release.

  5. usesdoi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110389

    The source study provides expert response labels used in this audit.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.