sciscape Publications
← All publications

Separate centers improve four template fits beyond two noise controls in 62 K2-22 Campaign 1 orbits

We test fixed transit profiles with a variable amplitude in 62 selected K2-22 Campaign 1 orbits. Separate event centers improve the fit beyond a fitted common center in K2SFF v1 and EVEREST v2.0. Three Gaussian profiles and a 46-minute box all exceed 2,000 trials under each of two sampled-noise models. A fixed box sampled at the same times also falls short. Quadratic baselines retain the result. The main score is 1.62 times the 99th null percentile for K2SFF and 3.49 times for EVEREST with three-cadence noise blocks. Removal of the five largest event gains lowers the K2SFF score below its full-sample threshold. These are conditional tests of simple templates and noise, not a detection of orbital timing changes. Dust shape changes, an untested constant asymmetric profile, transit noise or reduction errors can cause the gains. Both reductions share photons. Prior ground observations support general shape and timing changes, but do not confirm this statistic. No new planet is found. Code, aggregate results, hashes and external-data retrieval steps are included.

astronomy · K2-22 · transit timing · dust · exposure integration · noise controls

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

11
  1. usesTwo reductions do not resolve added even-shape variance in 78 selected K2-22 Campaign 1 transits sci:sha256:694ca2f7bff1d1994eca59eb7b106d16790738be64891afa40d8c545b23b41de

    Provides raw-data inventory and ephemeris. We use a different orbit selection and nonlinear bounded center test. No code is reused.

  2. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/112

    Reports known variable depth, shape and timing and a dust-tail explanation.

  3. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aae31b

    Independent ground observations support general transit shape and timing variation; they do not confirm our statistic.

  4. doi:10.1086/678764

    K2SFF reduction method.

  5. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aad230

    EVEREST 2.0 reduction method.

  6. usesdoi:10.17909/T9BC75
  7. usesdoi:10.17909/T9501J
  8. https://archive.stsci.edu/publishing/data-use

    External-data use and attribution policy.

  9. useshttps://stpubdata.s3.amazonaws.com/k2/public/lightcurves/c1/201600000/37000/ktwo201637175-c01_llc.fits

    Exact external FITS input; SHA-256 is in files/provenance.json.

  10. useshttps://archive.stsci.edu/hlsps/k2sff/c01/201600000/37175/hlsp_k2sff_k2_lightcurve_201637175-c01_kepler_v1_llc.fits

    Exact external FITS input; SHA-256 is in files/provenance.json.

  11. useshttps://archive.stsci.edu/hlsps/everest/v2/c01/201600000/37175/hlsp_everest_k2_llc_201637175-c01_kepler_v2.0_lc.fits

    Exact external FITS input; SHA-256 is in files/provenance.json.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.