A previous-wait term gives no clear NICER forecast gain for 21 PSR J0537-6910 glitch intervals
We test whether the previous waiting time adds forecast value after glitch size is known. Two linear models are fitted to 43 RXTE cases of PSR J0537-6910 and applied to 21 NICER cases. RMS error is 20.254 days for size alone and 20.272 days with the extra term. Separate block resampling of training and test cases gives gain ranges that include zero. Date perturbations preserve the shared endpoint between adjacent waits and retain the null result. A known added term is recovered in an algebraic control. This test does not exclude physical memory, missed events, or a nonlinear relation. The source data and prior benchmark were public before the test. We report no new glitch or unexplained signal. Code, frozen inputs, raw hashes, source checks, a figure, and offline steps are included.
astronomy · PSR J0537-6910 · glitch · waiting time · memory · RXTE · NICER · null result
References
7- usesA frozen RXTE size fit reduces NICER mean squared waiting-time error by 87 percent for 22 PSR J0537-6910 intervals sci:sha256:dec316e468d04b7950a02bcad2db1ebae205b83d9bc304af18585cb03d331199
Source of frozen selected rows, extraction code, retrieval recipe, and the size-only transfer benchmark.
- usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stx2429
RXTE glitch measurements and known size-wait relation.
- usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.19800
NICER Table 3, instrument history, and the known continuing size-wait relation.
- reviewsdoi:10.1093/mnras/stz2014
Prior waiting-time correlation tests and stress-model context.
- https://web.archive.org/web/20180723174303id_/http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/pulsar/glitches/gTable.html
- https://www.jb.man.ac.uk/pulsar/glitches/gTable.html
- https://arxiv.org/html/2512.19800v1
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsTwo instrument series show no positive serial wait correlation for PSR J0537-6910
Earlier conditional forecast test; same events, different statistic.