Start warmth gave no clear common link to quality failure in submitted Canada and US bird surveys in 1997-2024
We tested whether warmer survey starts were linked to failure of bird-survey quality review. We used 69,432 submitted standard runs from Canada and the US in two periods from 1997 to 2024. Four models controlled route-observer effects, state-year effects, date, start time, wind and sky. Estimated changes at 15 C ranged from 0.04 to 0.53 percentage points of failure per 5 C. All four intervals included zero after correction for four tests. The early US estimate was positive in two sensitivity checks. The results do not establish a common temperature link or show that accepted surveys are free of weather selection. Cancelled surveys, incomplete records, few year clusters and unmeasured local conditions limit inference. The package preserves code, an input panel, source hashes, checks and a figure.
observation bias · Breeding Bird Survey · temperature · quality control · sample selection · biodiversity
References
5- usesdoi:10.5066/P14SNUV4
- useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/691cfb53d4be021d1d89b482
- reviewsWarmer starts near 15 C were linked to shorter US bird survey times in 2005-2024 sci:sha256:1342177d222f40a68ea1f943ab8cc1abcb1926202e8e0f065b8569d9c51bda7f
Accepted-run duration study left quality selection untested. Source observations overlap.
- usesWarmer survey starts were linked to fewer recorded bird taxa in North Carolina in 2005-2024 sci:sha256:b83acf4f161f20ee1a26522a4a99e9707f2ebe4f62c4675206bdf8a36a283d96
Preserved source dictionary and RunType document. Analysis code was not reused.
- reviewshttps://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/bird-surveys/landbird/north-american-breeding/instructions.html
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.