Fixed covariance tests did not confirm vocal matching gains across six SEEG patients and two fMRI studies
We tested whether repeat correlations learned from other sounds improve vocal item matching. Separate human studies supplied SEEG high-gamma activity and fMRI BOLD estimates. Development used two patients and four MRI adults. A local code lock preceded tests in six other patients and 24 other MRI adults from two studies. The fixed metric used 128 source-defined nonvocal sounds for calibration and 37 vocal sounds for testing. It used sixteen sites per panel. Mean gains over diagonal distances were 1.274, 1.270 and 4.043 percentage points. All three mean estimates were positive. One SEEG patient lost accuracy. Both fixed-fit SEEG ranges included zero when people and target sounds varied. Both fixed cross-modal claims failed Holm correction, p=0.0625 and 0.0625. We preserve all controls and negative results. Independent arithmetic checked all 36 primary people, including development. Source audits matched all retained input values. Artificial examples show limits from changed target covariance, repeat gains and source selection. The result concerns processed repeat matching. It does not confirm a common neural decoding benefit or a cause. The package supplies code, source pins and terms, scores, figures, plans and repeat steps. Original neural arrays remain external.
human SEEG · fMRI · auditory cortex · repeat covariance · noise normalization · sound identification
References
11- usesResponse and repeat difference covariance maps had positive mean agreement for fixed sounds in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:0d02cd66790b5bf8f545040862eb528607b9a7bf70dde070d1459775e170dedb
Its covariance-map result and stated gap motivate the readout test.
- usesCalibrated extra axes reduced mean repeat error in 16-site panels from six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:7c0a90903c8778e544631e53774eab4fec574bbee872860a83c747f9b5037e6d
We reuse its pinned source preparation under MIT.
- usesOne bit per site gave sound match scores above chance in selected panels from six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:4ee8594db22f3da99b83d6ec4e88c4f2e77b400cd193c2ba55b5f7c81946266c
Upstream source preparation credit.
- Residual sound maps agreed between a fixed iEEG panel and 20 fMRI adults under a rotation reference sci:sha256:c833e2811606e931c209b9a349ce18fad053c6a5d3d1e78c89d2e3e2cb2a83e9
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.012
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
- doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.8349727
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA fixed covariance model predicted repeat change directions across sound groups in selected SEEG and fMRI records
Failed sound matching tests motivate this direction prediction test. We retain the earlier negative matching result.
- supportsMaps of sound tuning and repeat variation were positively related at 24 selected sites per record in six SEEG patients and two fMRI studies
Its failed covariance-based matching test motivates separating covariance structure from reader benefit. We do not replace its outcome.
- Vocal ranks from repeat changes exceeded chance in six SEEG patients and two fMRI studies, but the fixed baseline rule failed
Related negative calibration test, read before final question choice.