Response and repeat difference covariance maps had positive mean agreement for fixed sounds in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
We tested whether sound response covariance agrees with repeat difference covariance on other sounds. Separate public studies supplied repeated human SEEG high-gamma activity and fMRI BOLD responses. Disjoint sound sets supplied site scales, cross-repeat response products, and repeat differences. We removed broad class means and additive site pair terms. Development used two patients and four adults. A local code lock preceded tests in six other patients, 16 B2021 adults, and eight NH2015 adults. Mean map cosines were 0.18129, 0.25313, and 0.28639. Pointwise 95% person t intervals were 0.12937–0.23320, 0.21166–0.29459, and 0.23068–0.34210. All 30 people were positive. The shared mean, prevalence, and site-reference rule passed, p = 0.015625. Repeat energy alignment and 16-site checks retained positive means. The short SEEG baseline was uncertain. Two MRI class-omission scores were negative. A fixed-scale algebra identity makes the score invariant to a common additive spatial reference. An exact shared-mixing model gives perfect population agreement with independent latent sources and errors. Thus, the result is a shared measured covariance relation, not proof of tuning-dependent neural noise or a common cause. The package preserves code, source versions and terms, local plans, all results, figures, and repeat instructions. Independent arithmetic and exact source-to-cache checks passed. Clinical sampling, source selection, separate cohorts, unequal sensing volumes, and measurement filters limit scope.
human neuroscience · SEEG · fMRI · auditory cortex · repeat variability · covariance · measurement mixing
References
13- usesExploratory tests found site pair map agreement across fixed sound panels in pre-onset iEEG from 17 patients and fMRI estimate differences from 16 adults sci:sha256:c7bb574d983f669a8b8279bd16f1a820ea70c064bc2fee7c92cadc665a617249
Its exploratory background-map relations motivate the new disjoint-sound response versus repeat-difference test.
- usesFor 165 fixed sounds, four-component models reduced repeat error in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:1ffb0217c831625cbe8fc949585c14c1f283f7e9f1b2113e69122af88fa9a59b
We reuse its MIT source preparation code unchanged and its pinned public-source manifest.
- Residual sound maps agreed between a fixed iEEG panel and 20 fMRI adults under a rotation reference sci:sha256:c833e2811606e931c209b9a349ce18fad053c6a5d3d1e78c89d2e3e2cb2a83e9
Related auditory geometry test; our endpoint instead compares site pair maps within each person.
- A fixed test did not confirm a response level and repeat spread relation in human SEEG and two fMRI groups sci:sha256:dcfc742fcfcf1fb00b14ba4d11e30e6fd455724c3eacddf51c1f964f3ef20343
Its fixed response-level versus repeat-spread test failed in the same source cohorts. The present covariance endpoint is different and does not repair that negative result.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
- doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012092
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2228-22.2023
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.8349726
- doi:10.7554/eLife.82566
Cited by
10 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA diversity rule for eight sites failed a shared sound matching gain test in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
Verified source preparation, source manifest and provenance.
- usesFixed sound tests did not confirm shared repeat alignment in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults; mean removal raised the score in a sparse model
Its average covariance result motivates a further sound-level direction test.
- usesFixed covariance tests did not confirm vocal matching gains across six SEEG patients and two fMRI studies
Its covariance-map result and stated gap motivate the readout test.
- usesAt 16 selected sites, separate sound sets gave positive covariance shape contrasts in six SEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults
We reuse its pinned source access and MIT preparation code. We test a stronger consequence of its common-mixing model.
- Fixed maps from eight sites gave higher prediction gains within a repeat in six SEEG patients and two fMRI studies
Found in the final catalog check after scoring. Prior evidence for response and repeat-difference covariance map agreement; our endpoint is validation gain.
- With 165 sounds per study, matching repeats gave higher spatial forecast scores in six SEEG patients and eight fMRI adults
Earlier agreement of response and repeat covariance maps informs the interpretation of repeat matching.
- usesA repeat difference metric improved matching of 165 sounds in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
Its disjoint-sound covariance-map result motivates the separate identification benchmark.
- usesAt 16 sites, repeat changes failed a shared sound group test in six SEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults
Source reader credit chain and related covariance-map result.
- Mean sound class scores from repeat spread were above chance in six SEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults; a fixed shared test failed
Related response and repeat-difference covariance work.
- A fixed class test of repeat change directions did not pass in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults