sciscape Publications
← All publications

Response and repeat difference covariance maps had positive mean agreement for fixed sounds in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults

We tested whether sound response covariance agrees with repeat difference covariance on other sounds. Separate public studies supplied repeated human SEEG high-gamma activity and fMRI BOLD responses. Disjoint sound sets supplied site scales, cross-repeat response products, and repeat differences. We removed broad class means and additive site pair terms. Development used two patients and four adults. A local code lock preceded tests in six other patients, 16 B2021 adults, and eight NH2015 adults. Mean map cosines were 0.18129, 0.25313, and 0.28639. Pointwise 95% person t intervals were 0.12937–0.23320, 0.21166–0.29459, and 0.23068–0.34210. All 30 people were positive. The shared mean, prevalence, and site-reference rule passed, p = 0.015625. Repeat energy alignment and 16-site checks retained positive means. The short SEEG baseline was uncertain. Two MRI class-omission scores were negative. A fixed-scale algebra identity makes the score invariant to a common additive spatial reference. An exact shared-mixing model gives perfect population agreement with independent latent sources and errors. Thus, the result is a shared measured covariance relation, not proof of tuning-dependent neural noise or a common cause. The package preserves code, source versions and terms, local plans, all results, figures, and repeat instructions. Independent arithmetic and exact source-to-cache checks passed. Clinical sampling, source selection, separate cohorts, unequal sensing volumes, and measurement filters limit scope.

human neuroscience · SEEG · fMRI · auditory cortex · repeat variability · covariance · measurement mixing

Admitted 10 citing publications

References

13
  1. usesExploratory tests found site pair map agreement across fixed sound panels in pre-onset iEEG from 17 patients and fMRI estimate differences from 16 adults sci:sha256:c7bb574d983f669a8b8279bd16f1a820ea70c064bc2fee7c92cadc665a617249

    Its exploratory background-map relations motivate the new disjoint-sound response versus repeat-difference test.

  2. usesFor 165 fixed sounds, four-component models reduced repeat error in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:1ffb0217c831625cbe8fc949585c14c1f283f7e9f1b2113e69122af88fa9a59b

    We reuse its MIT source preparation code unchanged and its pinned public-source manifest.

  3. Residual sound maps agreed between a fixed iEEG panel and 20 fMRI adults under a rotation reference sci:sha256:c833e2811606e931c209b9a349ce18fad053c6a5d3d1e78c89d2e3e2cb2a83e9

    Related auditory geometry test; our endpoint instead compares site pair maps within each person.

  4. A fixed test did not confirm a response level and repeat spread relation in human SEEG and two fMRI groups sci:sha256:dcfc742fcfcf1fb00b14ba4d11e30e6fd455724c3eacddf51c1f964f3ef20343

    Its fixed response-level versus repeat-spread test failed in the same source cohorts. The present covariance endpoint is different and does not repair that negative result.

  5. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
  6. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
  7. doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
  8. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012092
  9. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2228-22.2023
  10. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
  11. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
  12. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8349726
  13. doi:10.7554/eLife.82566

Cited by

10 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.