A fixed class test of repeat change directions did not pass in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
We tested whether spatial patterns of repeat changes differ between 28 speech/song sounds and 128 other sounds. Separate public human studies supplied SEEG high-gamma amplitude and BOLD fMRI estimates. We canceled stable sound means by subtraction, removed change size and global sign, and excluded marginal-site products. An established two-sample statistic used only products from different sounds. Development used two patients and four adults. A local plan and code lock preceded tests in six other patients, 16 other B2021 adults and eight NH2015 adults. Mean scores were 0.00589, 0.02026 and 0.01577. Their 95% person Student intervals were [-0.00125,0.01303], [0.00456,0.03597] and [0.00921,0.02233]. The fixed shared rule failed. A positive result across modalities was not confirmed. The shared p was 0.34375. Removing the mean repeat change left all three person intervals across zero. All negative people and controls remain. One scalar gain per repeat, common to both classes, gives an exact score of 2 in a model. Fixed mixing also converts independent site variance changes into a positive score. These examples do not identify the human cause. Source selection, shared schedules, separate cohorts, sparse electrical coverage and unequal measurement filters limit scope. The contribution gives a cross-modal benchmark, code, source pins and terms, all results, figures, arithmetic and source checks, and repeat instructions. Original neural arrays remain external. No common neural cause or causal effect was established.
auditory cortex · SEEG · fMRI · repeat variation · sound class · directional second moments · two-sample test
References
10- usesMaps of sound tuning and repeat variation were positively related at 24 selected sites per record in six SEEG patients and two fMRI studies sci:sha256:470fe9a3793652ea5dbbfee38bddf515d2659ed52d74a5b9f4ece9f1af74b4d7
Source pins and adapted fetch, preparation and source-audit readers; related tuning-variation test.
- usesFixed sound tests did not confirm shared repeat alignment in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults; mean removal raised the score in a sparse model sci:sha256:3c26d490eb0ce925b251aa9880e48b2297152b0b121a0ea458c5fa67d822ae3b
Prior test found in a wider catalog search; it caused abandonment of the first unscored own-sound draft.
- Response and repeat difference covariance maps had positive mean agreement for fixed sounds in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:0d02cd66790b5bf8f545040862eb528607b9a7bf70dde070d1459775e170dedb
- A fixed test did not confirm a response level and repeat spread relation in human SEEG and two fMRI groups sci:sha256:dcfc742fcfcf1fb00b14ba4d11e30e6fd455724c3eacddf51c1f964f3ef20343
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
- doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0156-16.2016
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA shared cost of removing one sound mode was not confirmed in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
We adapt its MIT source fetch and preparation readers and pin provenance.
- usesEight learned sound response directions failed a shared gain test in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
We adapt its public source readers and exact input pins, with attribution.