The tested label, time, and contact changes do not explain SEEG export differences for patients 01 and 05 in ds003374 version 1.1.1
We tested whether label, time, polarity, or contact changes explain differences between two public SEEG exports. The source was OpenNeuro ds003374 version 1.1.1. All 51 trial-pair comparisons from patients 01 and 05 failed the fixed agreement rule. All 187 comparisons from the other seven patients passed. The largest search tested 62 recorded contact signals at 4,217,054 possible time placements for each target. Mappings were selected on one segment and tested on a separate segment. The largest absolute test correlation for the affected patients was 0.377823. Linear contact references also failed. The software recovered all 153 known transformations. These results exclude the tested changes. They do not identify the correct export or the cause of the differences. The package preserves code, derived SEEG data, source hashes, retrieval instructions, results, and figures.
SEEG · intracranial EEG · BIDS · NIX · amygdala · signal provenance · waveform correlation · data integrity
References
4- usesThe BIDS and NIX exports give different group delta estimates in seven patients from ds003374 version 1.1.1 sci:sha256:ab0856852350be70ca28479ce2b5a8563ebadc89100a994ce12bd574a51a7fc4
We used this audit's fixed source manifest, source metadata, MIT retrieval code, initial derivative arrays, and unresolved export result. New readers reproduced its waveform mismatch. We then tested label, time, polarity, contact, and linear reference changes with separate test segments.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003374.v1.1.1
The analysis used the pinned OpenNeuro ds003374 version 1.1.1 files; the source manifest records their hashes and S3 versions.
- doi:10.1038/s41597-020-00790-x
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116705
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.