Early signals from other shafts raised mean 120 to 500 ms SEEG forecast error at ridge penalty 1 in eight patients
This study tested whether early SEEG signals from other shafts improve a late waveform forecast beyond signals from the target shaft. It used OpenNeuro ds004696 v1.0.1 from eight patients with epilepsy. The test included 317 stimulation conditions and 1,933 distinct later pulses. Each query used five pulses to set means and scales. Ridge weights used the first five pulses of other conditions in the same patient. Input bins covered 20 to 100 ms; target bins covered 120 to 500 ms. At ridge penalty 1, adding other shafts raised mean error by 1.82%. The 95% patient bootstrap interval for the rise was 0.82% to 2.53%. Seven of eight patients had higher error. The error rise before the pulse was 2.11%. The paired difference did not establish a change specific to the after-pulse period. At fixed penalty 10, the error difference was near zero. An unplanned zero-waveform check did not establish a gain for either main model. The result limits this fitted model; it does not show that other shafts lack useful information. This is an offline transfer test. Other-condition calibration data can occur later in source time than query test data. The package preserves code, compact inputs, native examples, forecasts, scores, three figures, source metadata, checked retrieval recipes, and reproduction records. A clean replay matched all 11 generated numerical files in the recorded environment.
SEEG · waveform forecasting · ridge regression · brain stimulation · neural signals
References
4- usesLater input gave a small, uncertain error reduction for five-pulse SEEG forecasts at 86 sites in eight people sci:sha256:9541f97fcea19f1eca7a6f8adde2650a2ec1e865855212bbed2af09ea10d877d
This publication supplied context for testing early-to-late SEEG forecasts with five local calibration pulses. Its selected strong responses, fit design, and target interval differ. The present test uses metadata-selected readouts and other-condition transfer; it does not reproduce that result.
- usesMean rates of shared large errors in fixed SEEG waveform forecasts exceeded an independent pulse reference before and after pulses in eight people sci:sha256:450829ea4a2474fe15175fd53492702c0ade3f9d8500b65fe074084d20dbf994
This publication supplied the metadata cohort, readout selection and source retrieval code, pinned raw and metadata manifests, and native examples. The present run downloaded and decoded the source files again, then fitted a new early-to-late transfer model and tested added-shaft forecast error.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
This study used OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1 as its source SEEG dataset.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
The cited source paper describes the dataset's original study of electrical stimulation responses; the present publication tests a different forecast question.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Signals from other shafts raised mean 120 to 500 ms SEEG forecast error with past calibration at ridge penalty 1 in eight patients
[Legacy relation: reproduces] All 64 primary unrestricted patient error values matched within 4.45e-16. We used its selected compact inputs, models, and source recipe. We then tested a new rule that permits only completed past donor calibration groups.
- usesSignals from other shafts raised SEEG forecast error with earlier calibration at ridge penalty 1 in eight patients
This study uses its fixed cohort, extraction code, input files, and retrospective scores. We added earlier donor cutoffs and matched donor counts. All retrospective score rows agreed within 1.14e-13.