sciscape Publications
← All publications

Exact bootstrap averaging did not establish lower 20 to 500 ms SEEG forecast error after five pulses in eight patient sessions

We tested exact bootstrap averaging of a voltage forecast fitted from five early stimulation pulses. Public SEEG from eight epilepsy patients supplied 86 sites, 886 pair instances, and 430 separate later test pulses. The main window was 20 to 500 ms. Mean patient error reduction against the separate scale rule was -0.56%, with a descriptive 95% patient bootstrap interval of -1.21% to +0.01%. Three patients improved. The result did not establish lower error or equal performance. An exact proof shows that bootstrap copies change the expected off-diagonal energy proxy to the energy of the original mean. The tool sums 126 count vectors that represent all 3,125 ordered bootstrap samples. The package preserves code, products, coefficients, all losses, four figures, source maps, and retrieval instructions. Fresh native-source checks cover three patients. All eight input product sets passed hash checks, and an independent numerical replay matched. This exploratory result reuses one session per patient and does not test online control or clinical benefit.

stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · brain-computer interface · bootstrap averaging · voltage forecast · pulse response · calibration

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesVariance correction gave a mean 20–500 ms SEEG voltage score gain of 0.178 with five calibration pulses in eight sessions sci:sha256:b040cea1437949e0033ec509132184b28fcf4de8c96d3a3a02ba6c98fddb0792

    The publication supplies all-pulse trial products, eligibility maps, source metadata, pinned retrieval code, and inherited audit receipts. All 24 numerical input and map files passed exact hash checks.

  2. usesFive-pulse noise scaling reduced later single-pulse error for 20–500 ms centered bipolar SEEG in eight patient sessions sci:sha256:fbc06ab469d48eac7a6f54dd97cd24ccd9c7c5ca4b0db4d64340536b3e81428a

    Its separate five-pulse noise scale defines the reference forecast for the new exact bootstrap comparison.

  3. One shared site scale gave a mean patient error increase of 0.93% for 20–500 ms SEEG forecasts after five calibration pulses in eight sessions sci:sha256:e3470e4ee858b858d3acc334ca058aa28222108db67001be4d953814a1847d6d

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] All 160 available five-pulse patient losses for separate, shared, raw shared, full mean, and zero in four windows match within 2.3e-16. Its half-sharing control and differently weighted two-pulse shared rule are outside this reproduction.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

    The analysis uses author-supplied trial-voltage derivatives from OpenNeuro ds004696 v1.0.1; the publication records pinned URLs and hashes.

  5. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
  6. doi:10.1007/BF00058655

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.