sciscape Publications
← All publications

Imaginary coherency reduced beta null rejection for shared-contact bipolar edges in an independent contact phase model of eight SEEG recordings

We tested phase controls on fixed Fourier amplitudes from eight public SEEG recordings. Each person had six sections and 16 selected shared-contact edges. We made 50 null observations from independent contact phases and used 99 controls per test. At p <= 0.05, output phases gave a mean rejection rate of 99.25% for coherency magnitude. The rate was 0.02% for absolute imaginary coherency. The latter test rejected 90.59% of a specified spectral phase-lag control. An exact proof shows that output phases add half the squared shared-contact power to the mean imaginary cross-product variance. Thus zero mean does not ensure the same null distribution. The result applies to this fixed-amplitude phase model. It does not establish neural communication. The package contains code, data, source versions, checks, and reproduction instructions.

imaginary coherency · bipolar SEEG · shared-contact edges · phase controls · null calibration · wPLI · spectral analysis · finite-sample inference

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

3
  1. usesIndependent contact phase controls give absolute beta correlation above 0.30 on most shared-contact bipolar edges in eight SEEG recordings sci:sha256:b140aa736f880707f1f76cc167a2c578bc877c6ea56ddc6ca389a0996300da69

    Used all 48 saved contact Fourier arrays, montage metadata, pinned source records, and source readers. All 48 raw range hashes and 70 metadata blobs were checked again. The new work adds calibration for four phase statistics and a specified phase-lag control.

  2. usesOutput phase controls gave excess rejections under an independent contact phase model based on two public SEEG recordings sci:sha256:bc32ec23c4a59e283f17d49173adc61dd407e1ed08f2abf7e9b923f6ad4ebfca

    Used the earlier distinction between independent recorded-contact phases and independent bipolar output phases as context for the new question. No data or code from this publication were reused.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2

    The analysis uses fixed Fourier amplitudes from eight recordings in OpenNeuro ds004473 snapshot 1.0.2.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.