sciscape Publications
← All publications

Independent contact phase controls give absolute beta correlation above 0.30 on most shared-contact bipolar edges in eight SEEG recordings

We tested two phase-control models on public SEEG data from eight participants. Each recording supplied six fixed 20-second samples. We used consecutive good contacts to make bipolar channels. Independent contact phases before subtraction gave a participant-median shared-edge correlation of -0.497. Independent channel phases after subtraction gave 0.000. With fixed bipolar polarity, the paired median difference was -0.497. Channel-control intervals rejected 99.96% of unused independent-contact controls on shared edges. Contact-control intervals rejected 11.6%. A variance-based covariance formula predicted the contact-control means with mean absolute error 0.0042. The final run used 49 draws, with 24 training draws and 25 test draws. These short training sets give coarse intervals. This public-data benchmark shows that the control model must match the tested signal level. It does not measure neural coupling or clinical value. The package contains code, compact spectra, source versions, hashes, and a full retrieval recipe.

bipolar SEEG · phase controls · beta correlation · shared contacts · signal processing · surrogate data

Admitted 14 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2

    The benchmark analyzes fixed signal samples from all eight SEEG recordings in this exact dataset release.

  2. supportsdoi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a

    Cited for the source dataset and its forced two-choice finger-task recording context.

  3. doi:10.1093/braincomms%2Ffcae165
  4. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175
  5. supportsdoi:10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00043-9

    Cited for the surrogate phase-control method context.

Cited by

14 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.