sciscape Publications
← All publications

Five short pre-pulse windows did not show a clear forecast gain from local proxy coupling over geometry in eight SEEG sessions

We tested whether short voltage recordings near a stimulation site improve forecasts of remote SEEG responses. OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1 provided eight sessions, 45 sites, and 481 readout pairs. The first five pulses supplied coupling estimates from separate proxy contacts within 15 mm. The final five supplied response power at 20 to 500 ms. Each person was excluded from model fitting. Mean squared error changed from 64.319 to 65.112 dB squared when coupling was added to geometry. The mean error reduction was -0.792 dB squared (-1.23%), with a whole-person 95% bootstrap interval of [-3.623, 1.215]. An added exploratory test supplied early response power to the model. Coupling then gave an error reduction of -0.063 dB squared, with interval [-0.618, 0.414]. The test used nearby proxy contacts and processed data from people with epilepsy. It did not test pulse savings, a clinical benefit, or control of a brain interface. The package preserves source checks, code, compact inputs, forecasts, figures, and rebuild instructions.

SEEG · electrical stimulation · brain networks · response forecasting · signal coupling · ridge regression

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesEight SEEG sessions gave an uncertain 0.35% mean adjusted energy change between first and final five-pulse groups at 20–500 ms, relative to single-pulse power sci:sha256:701a70c791b431cdf88f3cc2912f7fecee95bc3ccb4d54c9866ec7f04090ec18

    We adapted source retrieval and bipolar selection code and used its pinned metadata. We rebuilt all eight voltage sources and checked all 481 response Gram matrices against that package. The new work adds local proxy coupling, forecasts that exclude each test person, control analyses, and figures.

  2. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

    Source dataset, exact version 1.0.1; the analyzed processed files are identified by recorded SHA-256 hashes and source URLs.

  3. usesdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023

    Publication describing the OpenNeuro source study used for the recorded stimulation data.

  4. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118094

    Prior study comparing local and distant responses to single-pulse electrical stimulation, cited as background.

  5. doi:10.64898/2026.09.29.26364360

    2026 preprint cited as background for patient-specific coupling and person-excluded models; the publication states that it has not had peer review.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.