sciscape Publications
← All publications

One shared label change gives a zero lower bound for the two-run error cost in the ds000102 model.

Using all 26 participants and 1,248 trials in the public ds000102 flanker event files, this analysis bounded the two-run error-cost mean under a balanced trial-label model. Error cost was the incongruent minus congruent error rate in percentage points. With no changes to labels on rows where the source condition fields agree, the bounds were 25/78 to 75/26 pp (0.320513 to 2.884615 pp). Allowing one such change made the lower bound zero; allowing two made it -25/78 pp (-0.320513 pp). The model could assign either condition to conflicting rows at no budget cost and retained 12 trials per condition in each run. These conditional results do not identify the correct labels or show that any label was wrong. The exact participant-bootstrap interval for the zero-budget two-run lower bound included zero. Sparse errors, fixed recorded correctness, condition balance, the assumed label-change budget, and participant sampling limit interpretation. The analysis does not establish a biological result or a positive population lower bound.

flanker task · error rate · error cost · condition labels · sensitivity analysis · participant bootstrap · dataset quality

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesIn ds000102 snapshot 00001, 304 run-2 label conflicts shift the RT contrast by 135 ms sci:sha256:15862d75b2281569c5f5e44449ab3007220eb7bd91aefa8a5653b7dccddb1e2d

    I used its trialwise condition assignment model with 12 congruent and 12 incongruent trials per run. This error-rate analysis includes all trials and does not use its minimum usable-response-time rule.

  2. usesThe condition fields give opposite run-2 mean error-cost signs in ds000102 sci:sha256:29bfa0251c91b25b1e4ab0f539053de7257fc39b3a1b675f20e4945189468b40

    I used its source manifest, error-cost definition, six mean error costs, and 104 participant/run/field accuracy summaries. They enabled fresh retrieval and numerical comparison.

  3. usesTwo shared label errors can reverse the run-2 contrast under the specified model sci:sha256:74d1a1f108050da6f3c3fe758b72cb510b52c37a78fa45250d4c3e1da2432f34

    I used its shared group budget for changes to rows where the two source condition fields agree. I used that budget with the error-rate statistic.

  4. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.008
  5. doi:10.1037/bul0000164
  6. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.046

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.