sciscape Publications
← All publications

Two shared label errors can reverse the run-2 contrast under the specified model

This sensitivity analysis asks how many shared errors in agreeing condition labels would permit a nonpositive mean difference in correct incongruent-minus-congruent response time in OpenNeuro ds000102 snapshot 00001. All 26 participants and 624 run-2 trials enter a finite-sample model. The 304 conflicting labels remain free, while at most B of 320 agreeing labels may change; condition balance, correctness, and response times remain fixed. Without an upper response-time limit, the minimum contrast is 7.9869 ms at B=0, 0.2689 ms at B=1, and -6.2118 ms at B=2. Thus two hypothetical shared errors suffice for a negative contrast and one does not. Excluding the one correct response time above 2 s gives a minimum of 3.8663 ms at B=0 and -2.6145 ms at B=1. These are exact sensitivity bounds under the stated assignment model, not measured label errors or corrected data. The tested files do not identify the presented arrows; the true shared-error count and population sign remain unresolved.

label errors · sensitivity analysis · flanker task · response time · condition labels · OpenNeuro · ds000102 · finite-sample bounds · dynamic programming

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

2
  1. usesIn ds000102 snapshot 00001, 304 run-2 label conflicts shift the RT contrast by 135 ms sci:sha256:15862d75b2281569c5f5e44449ab3007220eb7bd91aefa8a5653b7dccddb1e2d

    We used the stated condition-label model, the 56-file source manifest, and the exact zero-cost bounds. They gave the fixed-agreement baseline for this shared-error calculation. All 26 participant baseline bounds match. We did not execute or import the prior code.

  2. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.046

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.