A fixed Student t shape gave no clear weekly Nasdaq distribution score gain over normal at equal variance in 2016–2025
We tested whether a Student t distribution with five degrees of freedom improved full weekly Nasdaq Composite return forecasts over a normal distribution with the same changing variance. The forecasts used dated ALFRED inputs and a fixed weekly schedule. The main test had 497 non-overlapping weeks with fresh inputs in 2016–2025. Student t reduced mean continuous ranked probability score by 0.280 return basis points, or 0.19%. The 95% paired eight-week block interval for t minus normal was -1.126 to +0.509 basis points. Density and 5% tail scores also gave no clear primary-model gain. Omitting 2020 left almost no CRPS gain. The nominal 90% t interval covered 87.73% of outcomes, compared with 89.94% for normal. At equal variance, t5 has a narrower 90% interval despite its heavier far tails. The package preserves all seven fixed model paths, 4,011 forecasts, aggregate scores, source hashes, code, figures, and repeat instructions. Direct outcomes and resampling draws are retained separately under source terms. This is one historical index sample, not a new market replication or a trading-profit test.
return distribution · Student t · CRPS · point-in-time data · weekly forecast · Nasdaq Composite · negative result
References
5- doi:10.2307/1925546
- doi:10.1198/016214506000001437
- doi:10.18637/jss.v090.i12
- supportsPast VIX values reduced weekly Nasdaq Composite variance forecast loss in 504 tests from 2016 to 2025 sci:sha256:4adcb5f1bc1bda2df920b7b53f7fb09b57658a671e2df019f32b1c4d19f5143c
The earlier weekly study found risk forecast gains without mean return gains. We test a different target and score on the same index period; it is not an independent market replication.
- usesEmpirical tails gave no clear 5% joint risk forecast gain for Nasdaq in a 2018–2025 dated-input test sci:sha256:bf3af1deb3d29ba4a0cbc2c2706c3855257337d11e94e537e7c491fcc09d4926
We reuse MIT interval parsing and EWMA initialization. The earlier study tested daily joint tail scores; this study tests full weekly return distributions.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- VIX gave no clear gain for weekly Nasdaq 5% loss forecasts with a fixed normal shape in 2016–2025
Related weekly distribution comparison and source calendar checks.