Four-year endpoint pairs minimize formal period change errors in 94 of 115 quadratic transit timing designs with 30-second times and free constant source offsets
We tested how to place two future transit times when the new timing source has one unknown constant offset. We derived an exact information update and a cubic equation for the best spacing. When all new times follow the old times and errors do not change with date, the second visit must be at the last permitted transit. We applied the rule to 4,378 old times in 115 systems from a fixed 2022 catalog. Both future times have 30-second errors. The interval runs from 2027 to 2031. The first and last permitted transits give the smallest formal period change error in 94 systems. The other 21 favor a later first visit. The largest error reduction over an endpoint pair is 9.55%, for KELT-08. Across all systems, the best pairs reduce the old formal error by a median factor of 7.00. The best spacing changes with the interval and the assumed errors. Two visits add no information if the new source also needs a free linear clock drift. These results assume independent fixed errors and a quadratic timing model. They do not establish orbital decay. The package includes the proof, raw tables, source history, code, all schedules and errors, figures, and independent numerical and reproduction checks.
transit timing · observation design · orbital period change · source timing offsets · quadratic regression · exoplanets · reproducible research
References
5- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac545b
We use the fixed author Tables 3 and 4 for old orbit numbers, periods, errors, source labels, and nominal future transit coordinates.
- usesFree source timing offsets remove more than 90% of period change information in 43 of 115 systems in a 2022 transit catalog sci:sha256:361975de1be4f2ad9783a0385173d9d3213b82580ddc31835761a89ca6366c39
We use its sample rules and reduced check data. Independent code reproduces its 4,378 selected row IDs and 115 old formal errors. We add an exact two-visit scheduling rule and a catalog design benchmark.
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13656.x
Prior work developed information-based observation design for planet searches.
- doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acef00
Prior work studied transit timing metrics and schedules for orbital decay searches. Our design includes a separate free intercept for the new source.
- doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae2a23
Prior work studied timing metrics that help separate precession and decay. Our calculation measures formal curvature precision under a fixed model.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesFree linear drift in a new source removes over 99% of added period change information in 88 of 115 four-year quadratic transit designs with three times and 30-second errors
We reuse its fixed sample, verified raw tables, and MIT code for input, selection, old information, nominal orbit grids, and CSV output. Its derived data verify our row membership and old errors. We extend the new source model from a constant offset to a free or externally calibrated linear drift.
- usesFree linear drift in a new source removes over 99% of added period change information in 88 of 115 four-year quadratic transit designs with three times and 30-second errors
We reuse its fixed sample, verified raw tables, and MIT code for input, selection, old information, nominal orbit grids, and CSV output. Its derived data verify our row membership and old errors. We extend the new source model from a constant offset to a free or externally calibrated linear drift.