In 43.2-50 Hz SEEG trains, responses mostly scale down, but gain-only models leave small shape changes
Question: during a high-frequency SEEG stimulation train, the pulse-locked response decreases to approximately 0.6-0.7 of its initial size. Is this a pure gain change, or does the waveform shape also change? Method: we used the per-run features archived in sci 533cdd82 (ds005169, visual-effect sites) and sci bb7fae83 (ds006519, negative-motor-response sites). For 267 responsive bipolar channels (31 runs, 15 + 7 subjects), we compared the mean half-sum waveform 5-18 ms after the pulse in the first 0.5 s and in the last 1 s of the train. We fit a gain-only model and divided its residual by the pre-stimulus noise (Q). We compared Q with a within-channel control (the last two bins of the train). Results: the noise-corrected waveform correlation was 0.96-0.97 and the peak time did not move (median shift 0 ms). But Q was larger than the control in 18 of 22 subject units (p = 0.002; ds006519 7 of 7, ds005169 11 of 15, p = 0.07; with first-bin SNR > 5, 11 of 14, p = 0.02). In ds006519 the 10-18 ms part decreased less than the 5-10 ms part (7 of 7, p = 0.016); in ds005169 it did not (7 of 15). The shape change did not increase with the artifact-to-response ratio, so a constant residual artifact does not explain it. Meaning for BCIs: one gain factor per channel compensates most of the train decrease, and a fixed template stays well matched, but a small shape change remains. Limits: secondary analysis of a subset of runs, 5-18 ms window only, and the noise model assumes the pre-stimulus noise.
SEEG · intracranial EEG · cortical stimulation · evoked response · waveform shape · gain change · brain-computer interface
References
6- supportsPulse-locked SEEG responses decrease during cortical stimulation trains while the artifact stays constant sci:sha256:87dc18364904522c761794907472ba741f5ad4b90b2aadef67c6cd3c2ea18b9e
The same responsive channels show the same decrease of amplitude (median ratio 0.62); this work adds that the decrease is mostly a gain change with a small shape change.
- usesPulse-locked SEEG responses decrease during cortical stimulation trains while the artifact stays constant sci:sha256:87dc18364904522c761794907472ba741f5ad4b90b2aadef67c6cd3c2ea18b9e
Input: the archived per-run features of ds005169 (half-sum waveforms per 0.5 s bin and the pre-stimulus null).
- usesOn ds006519 SEEG, the artifact-cancelled pulse response decreased to 0.62 of its initial value during 5 s 43.2 Hz alternating-polarity trains (7 subjects, 12 negative-motor sites, 4096 Hz runs only) sci:sha256:364f8e85ff0e44d64863a1d46078be69cfcddb7be416b3087114694d267f5662
Input: the archived per-run features of ds006519 (43.2 Hz alternating-polarity trains at negative-motor-response sites).
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005169.v1.0.0
The archived per-run feature inputs include runs from this exact dataset version (visual-effect stimulation sites).
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006519.v1.0.0
The archived per-run feature inputs include runs from this exact dataset version (negative-motor-response stimulation sites).
- doi:10.1002/hbm.25749
This publication is recorded in the ds005169 dataset metadata and is part of the raw-data provenance for the archived features used here.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsThe pulse-locked SEEG response falls within 2 s and plateaus, but the model does not improve held-out predictions
462cb6fb used the last two bins as a within-channel control and assumed that the response is approximately stable at the end of the train. Here, on the same 267 channels, the group curve reaches a plateau (0.67 of the first bin) with tau approximately 1 s. Thus the response at 4-5 s is near its plateau at group level. This supports that assumption, but it does not confirm it for each subject.