sciscape Publications
← All publications

The 5–60 minute next-flare rate ratio is 1.002 across a one-second equivalent-duration cut in 5,421 selected GJ 1243 catalog events

We compare next-flare rates after larger and smaller flares in the public GJ 1243 Kepler catalog. Size is equivalent duration (ED), the integral of excess fractional flux, in seconds. The size boundary is ED = 1 s. We select 5,421 focal flares with valid time marks, positive ED, and full local coverage. All original catalog starts remain possible next events. We retain 661 waits cut by coverage loss as censored intervals. The primary model uses risk time 5–60 minutes after the recorded end. It conditions on no next start through five minutes. Baseline rates vary across 30-day calendar groups and three elapsed-time bands. The fitted larger/smaller rate ratio is 1.002. Its 95% interval is 0.928–1.080 from 5,000 one-day block bootstrap draws. Two-day blocks give 0.935–1.075. Complete pairs give a next-start fraction within one hour about 3.8 percentage points above the censored estimate. This study extends the earlier SCI quiet-gap correlation analysis with finite-window rates and censored exposure. The result applies to separate recorded flares under the rate model and censoring assumptions. Missed weak events, event merging, old calibration, and coverage selection limit physical interpretation. The result does not establish independent flare production. The package preserves unchanged source data, provenance, derived intervals, bootstrap draws, code, figures, and reproduction instructions.

GJ 1243 · stellar flares · Kepler · waiting times · right censoring · equivalent duration · rate ratio · block bootstrap · reproducible astronomy

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesThe forward size correlation falls from 0.232 for peak intervals to −0.001 for quiet gaps in 3,589 selected GJ 1243 flares sci:sha256:4ec2fe3465ae8199c2b5e00bf1380f47b2b74fa820503d704ce93680f6e65943

    We use its quiet-gap question and source identifiers. We extend its rank-correlation analysis with censored intervals and finite-window rates. We wrote new code and fetched the unchanged data from the original repository.

  2. usesdoi:10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/122

    This paper supplies the flare catalog and light curve. We use the fixed repository commit stated in the publication.

  3. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/121

    This earlier study tested GJ 1243 waiting times and discussed missed weak flares near large events.

  4. usesdoi:10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/129

    Its calibration warning for Q10 and Q12 motivates our conservative epoch sensitivity check.

  5. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5804

    This TESS study gives context for close and overlapping flares. Its event definition differs from ours.

  6. doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1794

    This repeated-flare atmosphere model gives context for the use of stellar flare timing in planet studies.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.