A power bound identified unchanged decisions under no clipping in eight fixed SEEG readers with uniform voltage codes
We tested uniform voltage codes in eight fixed readers from public SEEG recordings. A band-power bound gave a conditional check for an unchanged native decision. The check requires a flag for no clipping in the complete buffer and a known sample-error bound. At 12 bits per bipolar pair and a range of six training standard deviations, it accepted 47.71% of decisions as a mean across people. All accepted decisions matched the native reader. At eight bits, it accepted no decisions. The original 8-bit test compared contact coding before subtraction with pair coding after subtraction. The mean Brier-error difference was 0.035867. The descriptive 95% interval was -0.000649 to 0.089909. The sign-flip value was 0.148438. This comparison remains uncertain. The study reuses eight people and existing readers from OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. The proof uses real arithmetic. The software uses numerical guards and checked all native intervals. The package contains exact selected source windows, code, source records, all scores, four figures, and replay instructions. The check concerns decision fidelity. It does not establish correct task labels, live control, or brain stimulation.
voltage quantization · SEEG · signal processing · decision fidelity · power bounds · brain-computer interfaces
References
7- usesZero-centered 8-bit waveform codes reduced frozen SEEG task-state accuracy from 70.7% to 50.6% in eight recordings sci:sha256:f11a99582db0d0fff28986ef433b9cde1661cb1668cb5772f0a78262582c2b8c
Supplied prior evidence about voltage offsets in raw bipolar codes. The present code centers each range from early training voltage.
- usesRanges from each buffer reduced eight-bit SEEG probability changes compared with fixed early ranges in eight recordings sci:sha256:2b6438bb9befd725c9082cb5458f2673f67de783aede0e769e5d89d2ca0d5fe0
Supplied prior evidence about fixed and per-buffer pair-code ranges. The present range controls and bound keep the range fixed from early training.
- usesSimulated one-sample contact delays changed a mean 6.89% of later decisions in eight fixed bipolar SEEG readers sci:sha256:f4e97f0aaab3e15ac3db16e1f58265adf477db9d4f867e5557b55dc2f67ea989
Supplied the byte-range extraction pattern and source records. Delay outcomes were not analysis inputs.
- usesEight SEEG pairs classify pre-response and rest windows at 70.7% mean balanced accuracy in later trials from eight recordings sci:sha256:c74068384c7c056974c8568aab987cf5a8eee9979a622c22efa1b67a911e77fd
Supplied the fixed trial and pair choices, features, readers, pinned source objects, and source-reader code. All native features and test decisions matched this parent.
- usesPair coding gave higher later balanced state accuracy than contact coding with early fixed readers and ranges at a uniform 64-bit sample budget in eight SEEG recordings sci:sha256:940020fa46b275fd1d01fe99eb878b75cc6cbb521ffd3d44121ccb5085ce68d3
Supplied the closest prior contact and pair coding comparison, including an equal 8-bit control. The present work adds SD-based ranges, a Brier primary score, and a conditional power bound. It does not claim a first code-path comparison.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2
The analysis used SEEG voltages and events from OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2; the archived version-specific metadata record this DOI and a CC0 license.
- doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.