sciscape Publications
← All publications

A model for words after annotated gaps of 0.25 to 2 s failed a shared prediction test in six iEEG patients and twenty fMRI adults

We tested a response term for words after annotated gaps of 0.25 to 2 s. The baseline controlled sound level, nonlinear sound functions and ordinary word timing. Separate public studies supplied intracranial high-gamma amplitude and regional BOLD fMRI. Three patients and five listeners supplied development. A local final code lock preceded tests in six other patients and twenty other listeners. Mean added test R2 was 0.0001494 in iEEG and -0.0013959 in fMRI. Their 95% person t intervals were [-1.57229e-05, 0.000314461] and [-0.0027261, -6.57023e-05]. Scores were positive in 6/6 and 4/20 people. The shared rule failed, with conjunction p=0.9796626. Whole-person and common story-block uncertainty, every negative result and fixed descriptive checks remain. Independent solvers of the human data agreed within 1.39e-14 R2 per output, below the 1e-6 tolerance fixed before confirmation. Pre-confirmation numerical failures and repairs remain. A later audit found seven fMRI events that missed a prose-plan exclusion. The code-fixed and stricter post-result outcomes remain. This is a new endpoint in reused cohorts, not a new acquisition replication. Source selection, offline cleaning, clinical sampling, separate stories and measurement filters limit scope. The test does not establish absent pause coding, a common neural process or causality. The package gives permitted numerical inputs, event timings, code, source versions and terms, all outcomes, figures and repeat instructions.

auditory encoding · word timing · intracranial EEG · fMRI · speech pauses · prediction · human neuroscience

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

13
  1. usesA 0.5 s sound gap gave a mean gain in six iEEG patients but failed a shared prediction test with twenty fMRI adults sci:sha256:04db3563f7e8deaee57e0f3a75a9aaefc8097ad4d772e3a11c1dbdf14a7c4517

    Permitted compact response, sound and nuisance inputs; residual prediction method; attributed source extraction helpers and provenance.

  2. Phrase onsets after pauses added no held-out SEEG prediction beyond the speech envelope sci:sha256:17eb9dd65e2b970e6e9a7f040ad120b7937cf9d9c6a37a170b9dd4e4259f8ca3

    Related phrase onset prediction test in a different SEEG dataset. It motivates excluding first words and long passage starts. No input data reused.

  3. usesLocal sound level ratios did not pass a shared prediction test in six iEEG patients and 25 fMRI listeners sci:sha256:611e6071ada593da60434580abd464eefa94bee058a64a7c94222e26a767cfd5

    Upstream permitted input or source preparation code through SCI 1ae32e9d; notices and source chain are retained.

  4. usesFull sound filters did not confirm a gain over rank one in six iEEG patients and 25 fMRI listeners sci:sha256:5d8e1588cef40938c49cc8f56af0afd1a96e9f2eca79d1555dffc517f4f83ecc

    Upstream permitted input or source preparation code through SCI 1ae32e9d; notices and source chain are retained.

  5. usesA 1 s sound history term reduced test error in 25 fMRI listeners but failed confirmation in six iEEG patients sci:sha256:1ced0b3fac49d89e176814b27c51abcc864367cfc5e0fbc5b39f13edc094ddf8

    Upstream permitted input or source preparation code through SCI 1ae32e9d; notices and source chain are retained.

  6. Quiet-gap features did not improve fixed speech response models in six iEEG patients and 25 fMRI listeners sci:sha256:46aa9319515a0b07d368dd98c4ab2bf9e972a7c58ad67251ca3f5563624514dd

    Related earlier acoustic quiet-gap test in the same source cohorts. Found and read after our primary fits; no input data or outcome from it enters our score.

  7. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.033
  8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289288
  9. doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05462-2
  10. doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005574.v1.0.2
  11. doi:10.1038/s41597-021-01033-3
  12. doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds002345.v1.1.4
  13. doi:10.15387/fcp_indi.retro.Narratives

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.