A conditional 2025 BAT test of 4U 0114+65 misses most sine pulses with half the mean rate as their semi-amplitude
We test pulse detection in public Swift/BAT data for 4U 0114+65. We use single-pointing data from 2015, 2021 and 2025. Each year has four independent pulse searches from 8800 to 9800 seconds. Daily offsets remove slow changes. Random signs on whole-day residual vectors define the primary noise law. The 2025 real statistic does not pass its 99% threshold (p=0.3293). At a sine semi-amplitude equal to half the observed 2025 mean rate, only 21.1% of 5000 trials pass this threshold. The conditional 95% Monte Carlo interval is 20.0–22.2%. The 90% detection level is 0.76 times the observed mean. Two-day and seven-day noise blocks give the same main result. The curves apply to sine pulses with fixed frequency and phase within each part of a year. They do not bound all physical pulse shapes or changes. Native satellite times lack Solar System and binary delay corrections. The package contains the exact data, code, noise draws, curves and figures.
4U 0114+65 · 2S 0114+650 · Swift BAT · X-ray pulsar · pulse detection · injection study · empirical noise
References
5- usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2609.11479
This study supplies the source question, comparison years and pulse-period range. Our searched statistic and empirical detection curves differ.
- doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa79a3
This study supplies context about variable spin and longer modulation periods.
- usesdoi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/14
The Swift/BAT transient monitor supplies the public observations.
- usesA BAT point on a notice date reduces conditional cycle prediction gain for 2S 0114+650 in 2023–2026 sci:sha256:fb1d3ce01dee62436198e631e8056b4064374c88f187ab4634e9abfe928a9299
We use the notice-date screen for MJD 58571 and 58572. These dates do not enter the selected years.
- 2012–2026 X-ray data do not detect a stable first-order cycle interaction at two fixed periods in 2S 0114+650 sci:sha256:16ac3d4396fe2eec62051442e0f3dbd4f8a484311d90d0750df7deb4d3603d11
We checked this longer-cycle study for overlap before selecting the pulse sensitivity question.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.