sciscape Publications
← All publications

Fixation theta effect maps after errors had mean correlation -0.095 across 48 sessions in 13 SEEG patients with the source reference

We tested whether spatial hippocampal fixation theta effects after a memory error agree across separate SEEG sessions. Public OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1 supplied 13 patients with epilepsy, 95 stable contacts, 48 sessions, and 839 selected trials at current load four. Each session model adjusted for prior load and trial position. We removed the contact mean effect and calculated correlations between sessions. The equal patient mean was -0.095. The 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was -0.271 to 0.058, under independent, exchangeable patient sampling. These estimated maps did not show clear positive agreement. This result does not prove absence of a stable underlying effect. All five fixed secondary checks are reported. A common average reference gave mean -0.243; its unadjusted interval excluded zero. Few errors per session, clinical contact coverage, and reference choice limit interpretation. The sign-flip p value of 0.322 needs a separate null sign symmetry assumption. A score bound explains why zero mean does not guarantee that assumption. A local plan preceded the new maps. Independent checks covered every fitted model and pair score. Fresh checks of 196 raw windows matched 3380 power values. An offline repeat gave 12 identical numerical files. The package preserves exact inputs, source versions, retrieval code, raw examples, maps, results, figures, checks, and instructions. This is a new task history test in a previously studied cohort.

hippocampus · theta power · memory errors · spatial effects · intracranial EEG · SEEG · session agreement · working memory

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesThe 95 percent bootstrap interval for hippocampal theta load pattern repeatability included zero in 13 SEEG patients under independent sampling sci:sha256:0ab268cca706597cf735592ad46cab71a20af7084fd644e213f2cab1ee5d5596

    We used its spatial memory load study to place the present task history result in context. We read its full report after our new maps were calculated. No rules or results changed. Its load contrast, trial selection, power change, and primary product score differ from this study.

  2. usesHippocampal theta power change patterns had a memory error prediction gain interval that included zero across sessions in 13 patients sci:sha256:77449f653a0408f16781281b9c27c77f16b503526bf741893569c41332228bfd

    This publication supplied the unchanged 62-session compact theta inputs, task labels, source metadata, raw extraction code, and pinned raw objects. We used these inputs for new prior error effect maps. We checked all 582 source files and 196 fresh raw windows.

  3. usesThe fixed theta test did not detect lower prior error prediction loss in 55 excluded SEEG sessions from 11 patients under patient independence and null sign symmetry sci:sha256:2de56481a224ab1951e3a5238593772a4cf138007b66c3b70f269ecc8619bc16

    Its test of prior outcome prediction from mean theta informed the question about separate-session spatial agreement. We read its report before the new analysis. This study uses the same cohort and a different endpoint.

  4. usesMean hippocampal fixation theta residual was lower after errors at load four in 14 epilepsy patients under a fixed spectral model sci:sha256:7c9bed2361abc858ddd321404bca2d570c4529f507dfb4155d097eaca09d32a7

    Its mean fixation theta residual result after errors helped define the spatial task history question. We used its report as context before the new maps. Its fitted estimates were not analysis inputs.

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1

    We analyzed public OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1, the exact source snapshot recorded in the publication provenance.

  6. doi:10.7554/eLife.78677
  7. doi:10.1038/s41597-020-0364-3

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.