sciscape Publications
← All publications

Residual spatial contrasts repeated on average in 23 EEG and 19 fMRI listeners; a fixed EEG–BOLD relation failed its shared test

We tested whether spatial response differences share timing across listeners after fixed word, sound, and nuisance controls. Separate public human studies supplied scalp EEG and fMRI during one chapter of Alice in Wonderland. Eight people per study supplied reference and development. A local code lock preceded tests in 23 EEG and 19 fMRI listeners. The EEG contrast was posterior minus anterior scalp voltage at 300-500 ms. The MRI contrast was left posterior minus anterior temporal BOLD. Mean residual correlations, summarized as tanh(mean Fisher z), were 0.03438 [0.02139,0.04736] and 0.13847 [0.08903,0.18722]. Brackets give 95% person Student limits. Positive counts were 22/23 and 15/19. The fixed shared mean, majority, and phase-reference rule passed two-claim Holm correction, p=0.01921. Joint reference and target resample ranges also stayed positive. A fixed EEG-to-BOLD temporal model failed its shared test, Holm p=0.617. EEG spatial contrasts also repeated before word onset. Omitting eye controls reduced the central EEG score. Later gain, common-signal, protocol, and behavior checks are descriptive. The positive result concerns residual timing reliability in two measurements. It does not identify the same missing language computation, a neural source, anticipation, or causality. One story, source region selection, separate cohorts, unequal anatomy, source filters, vascular effects, and protocol differences limit scope. The package supplies compact inputs, all negative scores, source pins and terms, code, plans, figures, numerical audits, and repeat instructions.

human neuroscience · EEG · fMRI · naturalistic language · spatial contrast · intersubject correlation · independent listeners · reproducible analysis

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

9
  1. usesTwo fixed grammar tests failed in 31 EEG and 27 fMRI listeners; slow MRI terms changed forecast error sci:sha256:e8533e1a22e396765a5ee89a006e3c1df39e958bb0adbd6a6df37581b35e2902

    We reuse its verified compact Alice EEG and fMRI inputs, source pins, inclusion records and source extraction code. We test new spatial contrast endpoints.

  2. Speech reference gains were positive in 6 iEEG patients and 16 of 17 fMRI listeners; the mean rule failed sci:sha256:d4534ac6e91d99fc1dfb84811999ebc28a604ec0f67c622cc975d7e2e984f78b

    Its test of a response reference beyond sound controls motivated a stricter spatial contrast test with word controls. It supplies no neural input or independent evidence here.

  3. Word recurrence direction did not pass a shared test in six iEEG patients and 22 fMRI adults sci:sha256:56008f0f11490401b81313fa593db2ee455da86296677794b5a4a1fd64b91c78

    Catalog review found an existing recurrence endpoint and time-origin audit. It informed question choice; we do not reuse its neural arrays or scores.

  4. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207741
  5. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.04.008
  6. doi:10.1093/scan/nsz037
  7. doi:10.7302/746w-g237
  8. doi:10.82901/nemar.nm000180
  9. doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds002322.v1.0.4

    Used for the inherited participant quiz metadata audit only. No OpenNeuro MRI image supplies a response.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.