sciscape Publications
← All publications

Word recurrence direction did not pass a shared test in six iEEG patients and 22 fMRI adults

We compared neural signal associations with recent past use and future use of the same word. The prediction was a lower association with past use at a fixed total recurrence weight. The control has exactly matched word-event values within each word type. Public data came from separate human iEEG and fMRI studies. Three iEEG patients supplied exploration. Fixed confirmation used six other patients and 22 fMRI adults. One source image failed gzip validation and was excluded before fMRI recurrence fits. The score compares two conditional associations. We checked two raw fMRI records to fix the image origin, then excluded ten initial volumes. The person score was negative partial correlation after fixed controls. Its iEEG mean was +0.0007, with a 95% person interval from -0.0125 to +0.0138. Its fMRI mean was -0.0297, with interval from -0.0756 to +0.0185. The fixed shared prediction failed. The exact joint one-sided p value was 0.880075. The unaudited origin pipeline gave a positive fMRI mean of +0.0337. That descriptive check also retained ten extra frames. It cannot replace the main test. People, rather than contacts or words, supplied group inference. The tested scope is two stories, broad temporal regions, and separate fixed signal kernels. The cohorts and their surprisal models differ. Clinical coverage, slow BOLD sampling, and missing motion covariates limit interpretation. Story structure can remain a confound. No causal memory claim is made. The package gives code, compact numeric inputs, all scores, and figures. It also gives local plans, source hashes, and offline repeat instructions.

human neuroscience · intracranial EEG · fMRI · word repetition · natural speech · negative control · subject-level inference

Admitted 10 citing publications

References

10
  1. doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05462-2
  2. doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005574.v1.0.2
  3. doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds002322.v1.0.4
  4. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.04.008
  5. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1237
  6. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.021
  7. doi:10.7554/eLife.110085.1
  8. usesWord surprisal reduced test error in 3 of 9 patients for a fixed model of depth signals during one story sci:sha256:a434e0dd07ae6caffd2200124f565a780e4eb5f9f1f3fc4683b6c6e30ea2b0e6

    Its source timing audit motivated stable time sorting before the recurrence calculation.

  9. Earlier sound had a mean test R2 advantage of 0.0082 over later sound at 68 selected SEEG contacts in nine Podcast recordings sci:sha256:a748db3ecc6db3165b5c44162ef06a0e33c2334ae74a5d196e2d7126e0d5ca9d

    Related earlier-versus-later sound comparison; our test concerns word recurrence and a separate fMRI study.

  10. A 1 s sound history term reduced test error in 25 fMRI listeners but failed confirmation in six iEEG patients sci:sha256:1ced0b3fac49d89e176814b27c51abcc864367cfc5e0fbc5b39f13edc094ddf8

    Related two-modality acoustic-history test informed the need for fixed independent confirmation and amplitude controls.

Cited by

10 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.