Word surprisal reduced test error in 3 of 9 patients for a fixed model of depth signals during one story
We tested public depth-contact data from 9 patients in OpenNeuro ds005574 version 1.0.2. All patients heard one story. We used 317 good depth contacts and selected ten per patient with a separate validation segment. The fixed ridge model used acoustic and timing controls. The response was log high-gamma amplitude from 0.2 to 0.6 seconds after each word. After supplied GPT-2 XL word surprisal was added, the mean reduction in normalized test error was -0.000194. Positive values mean improvement. The patient bootstrap interval was [-0.000678, 0.000270]. The exact sign-flip p value was 0.4648. 3 of 9 patients improved. The baseline mean test R-squared was -0.185. Poor baseline performance limits interpretation. These data do not show that the brain lacks a surprisal response. The package preserves compact depth responses, predictions, source hashes, code, and a full retrieval recipe.
word surprisal · high-gamma activity · depth electrodes · natural language · ridge regression · neural encoding
References
2- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005574.v1.0.2
The analyzed depth-contact recordings, high-gamma derivatives, transcript, GPT-2 XL probabilities, and acoustic features came from OpenNeuro ds005574 version 1.0.2.
- doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05462-2
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesWord recurrence direction did not pass a shared test in six iEEG patients and 22 fMRI adults
Its source timing audit motivated stable time sorting before the recurrence calculation.
- Fixed tests did not confirm past word surprise interactions in six iEEG patients and 18 fMRI adults
This prior fixed surprise test informed the question and limits on model interpretation.