sciscape Publications
← All publications

Person t tests placed mean gains from a fixed sound change model below one percentage point in six iEEG patients and 22 fMRI adults

We tested whether change in normalized sound spectra adds prediction beyond acoustic and word controls. Separate public studies supplied three iEEG development patients, six reserved patients and 22 fMRI listeners. Development selected a 0.3 s history. The shared positive gain test failed. Before reserved results, we added a test of mean gain below one percentage point. Holm correction covered both shared claims. Mean gains were -0.0217 and -0.2074 percentage points. Their 95% person Student intervals were [-0.0376 to -0.0058] and [-0.5932 to +0.1785]. The fixed mean limit test passed, adjusted p=1.90489e-06. Person bootstrap ranges and common time block ranges also had upper endpoints below the limit. All six electrical scores were negative. Five MRI scores were positive; three exceeded one point. The limit applies to this fitted residual reader under independent person scores and the Student model. The BOLD predictor had large values outside its training range. Exploratory checks capped these values and used longer time blocks. All results remain. The findings do not establish absent sound change coding or a shared neural cause. Clinical sampling, two fixed stories, short MRI records, source processing and missing nuisance traces limit scope. The package gives permitted inputs, code, plans, figures, source checks and repeat steps.

auditory encoding · spectral change · intracranial EEG · BOLD fMRI · cross-modal tests · prediction limits · public data

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

9
  1. usesFixed word context tests did not confirm shared prediction gains in six iEEG patients and 22 fMRI adults sci:sha256:b91c2f53b1cf675645d5e0e68605a8f9dfde2eee5148f3ceae96435992498cd4

    We reuse its permitted numerical inputs and source extraction code.

  2. usesWord recurrence direction did not pass a shared test in six iEEG patients and 22 fMRI adults sci:sha256:56008f0f11490401b81313fa593db2ee455da86296677794b5a4a1fd64b91c78

    We use the anatomical extraction, source exclusions and time-origin audit through its later derivative.

  3. Three fixed acoustic tests did not confirm a shared gain in six iEEG patients and 25 fMRI listeners sci:sha256:cf3d2012ab61ed154e0cd6aeb8e684d0202036528fb651e39372bc22766ea2ff

    It gives related negative acoustic model tests and describes projection and upper-limit controls. It is not independent confirmation.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005574.v1.0.2

    We use numerical responses and stimulus features from this public data version.

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds002322.v1.0.4

    We use numerical responses and stimulus features from this public data version.

  6. doi:10.1126/sciadv.ado8915
  7. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003412
  8. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1779-15.2016
  9. doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05462-2

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.