An ecliptic frame model predicts relative Sector 85 time changes within 0.005 seconds in eight Camera 2 and 4 test stars
We test a relative time change reported earlier for one TESS Sector 85 star. We compare QLP v01 and TESS-SPOC files for 32 other Sector 85 stars and eight Sector 84 controls. The data contain 430,440 finite exposure matches. All 16 sampled Sector 85 stars on Cameras 2 and 4 show large changes across one data gap. The changes range from -144.701 to -95.947 seconds. The 16 stars on Cameras 1 and 3 show no such change. A fixed sky vector fails to predict the differences. A model that rotates the spacecraft position from ICRF to an ecliptic frame succeeds. We record a follow-up plan before reading time columns for 16 fresh targets. Each fresh target uses its measured constant offset before the gap. In the eight fresh Camera 2 and 4 stars, the fixed nominal J2000 angle predicts 27,057 good rows after the gap with an RMS error of 0.002157 seconds and a largest error of 0.004870 seconds. An angle fitted only on the discovery stars gives a largest error of 0.003777 seconds. The other eight fresh stars retain near-constant differences. The test uses selected files and new targets at shared dates. It does not prove a software cause, validate an absolute clock, or establish a planet. The package contains all 80 native FITS files, source hashes, the numerical ephemeris, code, figures, result tables, and offline reproduction steps.
TESS · QLP · TESS-SPOC · Sector 85 · time stamps · barycentric correction · ecliptic frame · spacecraft ephemeris · data audit · reproducible research
References
7- supportsThe tested TESS sector 85 files for V459 Cas show a 120-second relative time jump sci:sha256:87720866df921d9ef4c0aafdd33d0d7143f6a58d1d21f2bdc9dc7d34f8137172
We extend its one-star Sector 85 relative time result to 32 other stars and test a frame model. Its target is excluded from our sample.
- usesQLP–SPOC time differences reach 498 seconds and follow a sky model in a sample from TESS sectors 99–104 sci:sha256:fda43265575f6f4331d3b819b93fc9a3d26e2a688bf5fd789cc3bbb3f426db5d
We use its exposure matching, wide sky selection, and separate training and test target methods in a new sector.
- usesFixed sky models with SPOC corrections predict QLP–SPOC time differences within 0.09 seconds in 32 stars from four later TESS sectors sci:sha256:0e576b0ab6dede5da1700a070fee26634933dfd4b805ecc9f73564e076fd09cd
Its fixed sky models motivate the first hypothesis and its ephemeris sources inform the follow-up. The fixed-vector hypothesis fails for our Sector 85 sample.
- usesdoi:10.17909/t9-r086-e880
Source collection for 40 original QLP v01 light curves in Sectors 84 and 85.
- usesdoi:10.17909/t9-wpz1-8s54
Source collection for 40 original TESS-SPOC light curves in Sectors 84 and 85.
- doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abc9b3
Description and credit for the TESS-SPOC full-frame products.
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2011.06459
Description and credit for the MIT Quick-Look Pipeline products.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThe scaled eclipse interval in V821 Cas increased by 36.4 minutes from TESS sector 17 to sector 84
It already reports the sector 85 camera and time pattern. We cite that prior result when we apply a matched-cadence time control to V821 Cas.