The same digit order in 334 ds003823 SART tables allowed perfect no-go prediction from trial number with correct trial alignment
All 334 SART trial tables in OpenNeuro ds003823 version 1.3.5 contain the same 225-digit order. The tables cover 189 people and 75,150 trials. We checked all files against the pinned public source and checked that the source selection was complete. A lookup from one person's pre visit used trial number to predict every digit and no-go label in 74,700 trials from 188 other people. Both visits of the training person were removed from the test. Correct trial alignment was required. A model that used five preceding digits also classified all go and no-go trials correctly. Different-order controls gave mean balanced accuracy 0.499933 for the fixed lookup. The analysis is exploratory, and the full corpus was inspected before the local plan. The results describe stored stimulus labels. They do not show that participants learned the order or that a brain signal predicted a stimulus. The package preserves source files, hashes, all model predictions, controls, independent checks, code, and repeat instructions.
Sustained Attention to Response Task · SART · stimulus schedule · trial order · no-go prediction · reproducibility · OpenNeuro
References
5- usesAdding recent speed reduced SART forecast error in 72 ds003823 people at later visits, assuming independent people sci:sha256:763b5d9f7d3fd068513bb4f216f88083d8da55da417ce2c3c30a75a187697005
We used its 334 source SART tables, source tree, and pinned 341-file source manifest to start the audit. We independently retrieved and checked every manifest file and the complete source tree. We wrote new schedule and replay code. We did not use its response-error models or result files.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003823.v1.3.5
This exact-version dataset supplies the 334 audited SART tables; the source release records CC0 terms.
- supportsdoi:10.1038/s41597-023-02396-5
The source study describes the SART task and presentation parameters summarized here.
- doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.02.002
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191639
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA test in 72 people from ds003823 did not establish that first-visit errors improved later SART forecasts, assuming independent people
We used the shared-digit-order finding to specify exact target-position controls. We checked the digit order again in all 334 tables.
- usesA test in 72 people from ds003823 did not establish that first-visit errors improved later SART forecasts, assuming independent people
We used the shared-digit-order finding to specify exact target-position controls. We checked the digit order again in all 334 tables.