Observer changes had no clear link to pooled route call-list turnover on 506 NAAMP routes in 2001–2015
We tested whether annual frog and toad call lists changed more when the observer changed. We used the USGS NAAMP release and matched the same eight to ten sites over three survey visits in each of two adjacent years. The main sample has 1,590 year pairs on 506 random routes in 21 US states in 2001–2015, including 135 observer changes. The response was Sorensen distance between annual taxon lists pooled across a route. A linear model had route and state-year effects and controls for survey date and air temperature changes. The adjusted observer-change estimate was +0.0196 on a zero-to-one scale. Its nominal 95% interval was −0.0198 to +0.0590, with clusters by route and year. All planned route-level checks had intervals that included zero. A planned secondary measure, mean distance between lists at matched individual sites, gave +0.0533, with interval +0.0205 to +0.0861. Thus the main route-level association was uncertain, while the site-level response had a positive association under the model. These records do not identify true colonization, extinction, or observer error. Non-random observer changes, local habitat changes, unmeasured survey conditions, and the selected complete-visit sample limit interpretation. The package contains unchanged source data, source hashes, a local plan, matched-site tables, all results, figures, code, and an independent raw-data and model check.
amphibians · NAAMP · observer changes · species turnover · call surveys · sampling effort · reproducibility
References
8- usesdoi:10.5066/F7G44NG0
Unchanged USGS NAAMP 1994–2015 source archive supplies visits, observer IDs, fixed site IDs, call records, temperature and protocol metadata.
- usesSpring wetness predicted frog and toad calling occupancy on 1,036 NAAMP routes in the eastern and central USA (2001–2015), but wetness in the three previous summers did not sci:sha256:9024f830dbd63c96f78cf3c37c69df4d40aa1fa4b3c50d7a774c189c997e48a8
We restore the unchanged raw NAAMP archive from its retained dataset. It also provides prior context for analysis of seasonal call records. We do not reuse its code or derived tables.
- Spring wetness showed no clear link to repeat calls in 18 frog and toad groups in NAAMP records, 2001–2015 sci:sha256:f756ec4b7a6bb689eb204749e4e6159d82eb47aaa5177072ef2ffbb24b4e18d6
Prior work on repeat-call records explains limits of interpreting calls as true site occupancy. We read and verified the publication.
- doi:10.2193/2005-759
Prior experimental evidence of observer errors in anuran call surveys.
- doi:10.2193/2009-321
Prior field experiments show effects of observer ability and survey conditions on call-record errors.
- doi:10.1890/11-2129.1
Prior experimental work on false records and observer ability in auditory species surveys.
- doi:10.1086/701672
Non-random dropout in NAAMP is a key reason that observer changes cannot be treated as random treatments.
- usesdoi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x
The planned list-distance partition uses the established replacement and richness components.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- NAAMP visits with six or more cars had 0.10 fewer call groups after site and survey control in 2001–2015
This study tests observer changes and annual call-list change in NAAMP.