Six-bit asinh encoding gave lower balanced error than tuned uniform encoding with one range in processed SEEG at 86 selected sites after five calibration pulses per site
We tested six-bit digital encoding in processed public SEEG from eight people with epilepsy. There were 86 selected bipolar readouts. The first five pulses at each site set the parameters. The final five pulses supplied the test data. Asinh encoding gave a 72.5% decrease in the geometric balanced error ratio relative to tuned uniform encoding with one range per site. All eight person log effects favored asinh. The arithmetic mean error decreased by 34.2%. A further uniform control used two ranges selected by known pulse timing. Its arithmetic mean error was 67.2% lower than asinh, although the mean log comparison favored asinh. This control was added after the primary scores were known. Thus, the main claim applies to the tested uniform encoder with one range. The work adds a public benchmark, fixed encoders, and saved six-bit streams. All eight complete source files passed fresh hash checks and reproduced the archived voltage exactly. The supporting archive retains voltage, provenance, results, three figures, and packed streams. GPL analysis and retrieval scripts are omitted, so the public package does not provide an executable reproduction path. The study does not test live recording, an analog converter, or clinical benefit.
SEEG · neural signal processing · asinh encoding · quantization · electrical stimulation · balanced error · brain-computer interface
References
4- usesA map trained on other sites gave a 0.63% mean gain for 100–500 ms SEEG forecasts at 86 sites in eight patients with five calibration pulses per site and complete donor calibration sci:sha256:da9ab1c1b029cb260a850a10fed4700f65073a348e6389d8105ca5ff28eec48d
We used its selected bipolar voltage arrays, pulse order, contact maps, source hashes, retrieval code, and source processing files. These files supplied the public SEEG test set and allowed exact reconstruction from complete source files. We tested digital encoding, a new question on the same cohort.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The study used processed SEEG trial voltage from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1.
- supportsdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
This is the source study for the electrical stimulation dataset and cohort context.
- doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2604397
Background example of prior nonuniform encoding for neural recording.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA calibration waveform reduced mean relative six-bit code error at 86 selected processed SEEG sites in eight people with known pulse times
Its encoding benchmark showed that separate before and after voltage ranges change the comparison. We used separate tuned direct ranges as the baseline and tested a new shared waveform residual and constant control on the reused cohort.
- usesA five-pulse template gave mixed six-bit error changes at 86 selected SEEG readouts with known pulse timing
We used its selected processed SEEG voltage, pulse order, contact maps, source hashes, scalar code, and retrieval recipe. Its pulse-time uniform control supplied the reference for the new fixed-template question. We used the same cohort and split, with matched calibration searches for direct and residual codes.
- usesNoise correction increased readout agreement for 20–500 ms SEEG from five pulses with 3-bit dither encoding and lossless overflow in eight patients
Used its shared-range encoding result on selected readouts to frame the separate test of candidate readout choice under digital encoding.