Region control preserves SOZ separation by sleep HFA features in 17 patients; region explains 10–13%
In 17 UCLA SEEG patients with interictal sleep recordings, we tested whether gray-matter bipolar-pair separation of clinical seizure-onset-zone (SOZ) from non-SOZ pairs by 80–300 Hz log power (log_hfa) and delta-phase/HFA modulation index (mi) persisted after leave-one-patient-out regional normalization. The pre-registered analysis used 896 gray-matter pairs (159 SOZ) across 32 dataset atlas labels; 857 pairs (158 SOZ) had a regional norm. Residual SOZ/non-SOZ AUC was 0.684 (95% CI 0.598–0.763; 14/17 patients above 0.5; Holm p=0.003) for log_hfa and 0.626 (0.543–0.697; 15/17; Holm p=0.007) for mi. Region-only AUCs were 0.564 (p=0.32) and 0.528 (p=0.71). Regional normalization reduced AUC by 0.021 and 0.020, respectively; the estimated shares explained were 10% and 13%, with confidence intervals for the AUC differences including zero. Within-region AUCs were 0.681 (95% CI 0.532–0.812; p=0.030) and 0.613 (0.509–0.710; p=0.054). This differs from a prior awake HUP result in which region explained one half to two thirds of separation; cohort, state, features, and region definition differ, and this analysis did not identify which factor accounts for the difference. Limitations include dataset atlas labels without MRI checks, small region norm samples, clinical SOZ labels, 90 seconds of sleep per patient, features inherited from a prior analysis rather than recomputed here, 17 analyzed patients, wide confidence intervals, and insufficient mesial temporal data for an informative subgroup test. A small regional effect (D below about 0.06) is not excluded.
intracranial EEG · seizure-onset zone · high-frequency activity · phase-amplitude coupling · brain region · epilepsy · AUC · regional normalization
References
4- supportsIn 18 UCLA sleep SEEG patients, HFA power and delta-HFA coupling separated SOZ pairs in gray matter; white matter added 0.06 to coupling AUC sci:sha256:91cdaa1cddcccbf62097866a242301ba60009ff17cd5c78d3875bd6b37a1558b
The GM-only SOZ separation of 14050710 stays after region control (residual AUC 0.684 and 0.626).
- usesIn 18 UCLA sleep SEEG patients, HFA power and delta-HFA coupling separated SOZ pairs in gray matter; white matter added 0.06 to coupling AUC sci:sha256:91cdaa1cddcccbf62097866a242301ba60009ff17cd5c78d3875bd6b37a1558b
We copied the verified table and the tissue-class rules (GM label set) from this package.
- usesIn 18 UCLA SEEG patients, slow-wave coupling and HFA power marked clinical SOZ pairs, but MI did not add significantly to HFA power sci:sha256:1b8e053b1e9a70cf0169410d7b453807a38c1caa4cfea6d6d5d2baf9631628cf
The per-pair feature table channels_A.tsv (log_hfa, mi, label, soz) is the input of all tests.
- challengesIn 36 HUP SEEG patients, region matching reduced high-gamma and line-length SOZ separation; spike-like rate remained sci:sha256:2057f2f243aeb5675d28b8c2722da8e27f5cf10ddbf3d7ec49c54801406d10e6
63ce7b48 found that template region explained one half to two thirds of the SOZ separation in awake HUP data (ds004100). In ds005398 sleep GM pairs, a similar leave-one-patient-out region norm explained only 10-13% (D = 0.02, CI includes 0). The general claim that region explains most of the interictal SOZ separation does not hold in this cohort. Cohort, state, features and region definition differ.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.