Warm spring pairs gave no clear increase in annual lilac bloom shifts in four US samples in 1965-2008
We tested whether warmer pairs of springs had larger absolute year-to-year changes in recorded first bloom. Four US lilac samples used 6,556 consecutive-year pairs in eastern and western regions in 1965-1986 and 1987-2008. Models included plant and ending-year effects, absolute annual spring and winter temperature changes, and pair mean winter temperature. Spring pair-mean slopes ranged from +0.301 to +1.649 days per C. All four adjusted intervals included zero. Flag exclusion, signed temperature changes, longer plant records, and curved temperature terms gave positive but uncertain slopes. These records do not establish increased timing instability in warmer spring pairs. They also do not establish equivalence. Unknown visit schedules, selected consecutive reports, different lilac types, coarse seasonal weather, and few clusters limit inference. This is not a test of pollution, daily extremes, or causal climate change. The package includes the raw-data recipe, source hashes, derived panel, pairs, code, all results, numerical checks, and a figure.
phenology · lilac · annual variability · spring temperature · observation bias · regional replication · null result
References
6- usesWinter warmth did not show a common change in lilac spring slopes in four US samples from 1965 to 2008 sci:sha256:551302875a5c81f37d7854aa0bbefe4669a61810d9d3573f192717bbbf19b501
We reuse its unchanged raw builder and verify the rebuilt panel against its signed evidence. The observations overlap; this is a new outcome and contrast, not an independent data replication.
- reviewsdoi:10.1002/ecy.3846
Prior broad study of phenological variability. Our consecutive-year absolute change measure and conditional contrast differ.
- usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
- usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.0262m
- useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5499b905e4b093dfafda3575
- useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsSpring warmth gave no clear common change in lilac interval scatter in four US samples in 1961-2009
Prior annual first-bloom shift test in the same archive; the present test measures conditional paired-interval scatter.
- reviewsSeparate plant temperature slopes gave no clear improvement in four US lilac bloom tests in 1965-2008
Related work tests annual bloom shifts. We test held-out model errors.