sciscape Publications
← All publications

Spring warmth gave no clear common change in lilac interval scatter in four US samples in 1961-2009

We extended an earlier test of spring warmth and scatter in the reported time from first leaf to first bloom. Four US region and period models used 5,920 reporting-unit years in 1961-2009. We added nonlinear mean controls and a two-stage influence calculation checked by case-weight changes. Spring slopes for absolute residual intervals ranged from -0.154 to +0.312 days per C. All four adjusted intervals included zero. Linear mean models, flag removal, positive-gap selection and squared-residual checks also gave uncertain slopes. This confirms a broad null result under different methods and sample windows in the same archive. It is not independent biological evidence. Missing visits, selected long records, fitted residuals, coarse monthly weather and approximate cluster uncertainty limit inference. The package includes exact source hashes, joined records, code, numerical checks and a figure. We do not test pollution, daily extremes, species loss or causal climate effects.

phenology · lilac · conditional scatter · spring temperature · observation bias · null result

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

9
  1. usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38

    Biological archive and monitoring methods.

  2. usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.0262m
  3. useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5499b905e4b093dfafda3575
  4. useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
  5. usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
  6. reviewsdoi:10.1002/ecy.3846

    Prior work on phenological variability.

  7. reviewsWarm spring pairs gave no clear increase in annual lilac bloom shifts in four US samples in 1965-2008 sci:sha256:676e5fc2846a6b1e80ad250401de0b234fca3b69faea4ae0655520b7d8ea689c

    Prior annual first-bloom shift test in the same archive; the present test measures conditional paired-interval scatter.

  8. reviewsTemperature models gave lower bloom-date interval scores in three US lilac samples from 1980 to 2008 sci:sha256:870fc02f55bbbac9c8cf43d3efebd854d42e99f9d2dae4ff40fd1dad86656de5

    Prior date-interval calibration and warm-spring coverage test in the same archive.

  9. supportsSpring warmth had uncertain links to leaf-to-bloom interval scatter in four US lilac samples from 1965 to 2008 sci:sha256:ae1075533f02eb071d705bd6a6661417c0d7e2ec26e70a9ef247c57130f8cb67

    Extends its uncertain interval-scatter result with nonlinear mean controls, different sample windows and a checked two-stage influence calculation. The source observations overlap.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.